This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Capital Governance (S) Pte Ltd (Delisted)

Service Providers Framework 2020

You are in Research and Data Provision » Research/process level

Research/process level

RDP 02. Sources for research and/or rating

02.1. Indicate the types of sources you use for research and/or ratings of companies/sectors/geographies or similar. Tick all that apply.

02.2. Indicate how ESG factors are incorporated into your research and/or rating methodology

02.3. Describe how you define materiality and how this is captured in your research and/or rating methodology as well as final product.

          .GRI's materiality principle indicates that an organization considers its significant impacts on the economy, the environment, and society as one of the dimensions by which a topic can be considered material; and does not overlook elements of this dimension, by focusing only on impacts that are significant for the organization.

We assess from stakeholder interactions along with given consultant analysis and collected secondary data the material topic disclosures to cover given the importance to stakeholders and the impact of such disclosure topics to the company and environment. These assessments are directly reflected in the report since it is necessary to disclose the materiality assessment for the report to help improve transparency to report users.
        

02.4. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


RDP 03. Stakeholder input

03.1. Describe how you actively include input and information, wherever possible, from relevant stakeholders or interested parties, in the research process or in reaching assessment conclusions.

          Inputs based on client data
        

03.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


RDP 04. Up-to-date assessment and ratings

04.1. Indicate how you ensure that your ESG assessment of companies/ sectors/ geographies or similar is up-to-date and that new information is incorporated or new assessments are conducted at reasonable intervals.

04.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


RDP 05. Balanced research and assessment

05.1. Indicate how you typically ensure a balanced approach to your research methodology and assessing/rating of companies/sectors/geographies or similar. Tick all that apply and explain your approach to each option.

Type of indicators

Explain your approach

          We provide comparability to past performance by showcasing results side by side annually and help provide clarification and possible restatement (prospective and retrospective) where changes to methods of assessment are made or where more accurate information for the available period exists and is yet to be integrated into the results.
        

05.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


RDP 06. Consistency and comparability

06.1. Describe the control processes in place to ensure quality of research.

          The principal of Capital Governance and is responsible for quality of research. Research cycles are held on a as needed basis after determining the importance of such data needed for report integration or for consultancy. After assessing the level of importance, the amounts of reviews are adjusted accordingly, along with the scope of assessment in terms of data quality and quantity.
        

06.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


RDP 07. Emerging ESG issues and trends (Private)


RDP 08. Client use of outputs (Private)


RDP 09.


Top