This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI)

Service Provider Reporting Framework 2017

You are in Stewardship Services » Engagement


SS 02. Your definition of engagement activities

02.1. Provide a brief description of what your organisation defines and/or interprets as engagement activities.

          ACSI defines engagement as any medium of company communication where there is a meaningful discussion or response produced. This can be through letters, email, telephone/conference or an in-person meeting.

SS 03. Acquiring ESG data and information

03.1. Describe how and where you acquire your ESG data and information.

          •	Company research, including formal and informal sustainability disclosure mechanisms
•	Thematic research
•	Analysis
•	Third party providers
•	Company engagement
•	Issues arising from company AGMs
•	Public disclosures, government reporting and media reporting

03.2. Describe how this information influences your product offerings and/or how you implement your services.

          ACSI uses a range of company-disclosed and independently-sourced information to create comprehensive analysis and research for our members, to help determine ACSI’s priority engagement themes and target companies, and to evaluate company progress towards ACSI’s objectives (which are set in consultation with members). 
ACSI also analyses and commissions information from third-party providers, arranges company engagements to pursue issues arising from AGMs, and uses that information to inform its proxy voting, engagement and research projects.

SS 04. Prioritizing engagement topics

04.1. Describe how you select priority engagement topics to raise with companies.

          ACSI’s engagement program seeks to influence companies through constructive engagement with ASX300 boards about material ESG issues. Currently, ACSI has five priority engagement themes, which for 2016 consisted of 49 companies in the ASX200 index. The issues are drawn from a range of sources, based on a significant amount of internal and external research, proxy voting outcomes and current issues. ACSI then further prioritises companies by taking into account the holdings of our members, focusing on the largest aggregate member holdings. For engagement, ACSI creates a list of priority engagement companies which is reviewed annually and monitored and evaluated semi-annually.

04.2. Describe how you define the objective of the engagements and reach agreement on this with the client.

          ACSI annually creates a list of engagement priority companies with specifically defined concerns and objectives for each company. ACSI’s objectives are to achieve meaningful changes in company behaviour, alongside some more binary company-specific objectives, such as 30% women on boards in the ASX200 by the end of 2017. ACSI also sets objectives for the proportion of all priority companies where objective are met, for example, ACSI may aim for over 50% of all priority companies’ objectives to be met. 

This process  is overseen by a Member Council, in consultation with Management. ACSI members actively contribute and set the goals and direction that ACSI takes.

SS 05. Engagement model and clients’ needs

05.1. Describe the processes that are in place to ensure that your engagement model takes into account the diversified needs of your clients.

          ACSI is made up of 29 Australian superannuation funds, and six overseas pension funds, which actively contribute and set the goals and direction in consultation with ACSI Management, via a Member Council. This ensures that ACSI’s engagement model is aligned with the values and goals of the member funds. 

ACSI does further ad hoc, specific work for certain members, where requested, in pursuit of fulfilling their own additional ESG requirements and objectives.

05.2. Describe how you align your engagement strategy with your client's investment principles and policies.

          Both ACSI’s annual engagement priority targets and its Guidelines for operation are set in consultation with its Member Council. This means that the targets and objectives are approved by members, and the principles are adopted are signed off by their representative members on the ACSI Council.

SS 06. Channels of engagement

06.1. Indicate what channels you use to engage. Tick all that apply and indicate the frequency with which you typically use the channels.

Engagement type





06.2. Describe your typical execution method.

          During 2016, ACSI met with 135 ASX300 companies in 181 formal engagements. These meetings are generally organised ahead of the companies’ shareholder AGMs, or shortly after those events, where material issues have arisen or are perceived as likely to arise. The meetings almost always occur with Non-executive members of the boards, usually at the level of company Chair, often including board committee chairs responsible for People and Remuneration issues. Most boards also bring investor relations, general counsel or HR executives for part of the discussions.

Our ‘execution method’ relies on identification of specific issues, and the actions/outcomes we are seeking from the company, and the company’s actions to address the issues identified. 

Some engagements are driven by thematic issues, either through ACSI’s pre-determined priority programs or where issues emerge in specific sectors which are seen as potentially damaging to long-term investment values: - i.e. ethical sourcing after the clothing manufacturing tragedies in  Bangladesh or in franchising structures in relation to underpayment of workers, or when ACSI’s research highlights a particular risk within a company or sector. 

For all companies covered by ACSI’s voting service, ACSI usually corresponds either via meeting or teleconference around the time of the company meeting, or writes to each company where there was an ‘against’ recommendation expressing its rationale and concerns. Companies where there are more material concerns become corporate governance engagement priorities where ACSI typically holds face-to-face meetings with the company seeking a change its practices.

Alongside meetings, ACSI sent 314 letters to company chairs on topics including board confidence, sustainability reporting practices and board gender diversity. 

The general process undertaken as a part of the engagement process include taking into consideration:
•	Priority company issues 
•	Internal and external research
•	Proxy voting research and outcomes
•	Any type of publicly available documents e.g.: annual reports, sustainability reports. 
•	Media
•	Controversies

SS 07. Accessing the appropriate teams when engaging with companies

07.1. Describe how you ensure that you have access to the appropriate teams and team members at the company you engage with.

          ACSI generally meets with ASX300 company chairs, with the preference of an independent chair or lead independent board member.

07.2. Indicate from the options below the employee at the company you typically engage with.

Employee level






07.3. Describe how you ensure the client’s rationale and engagement objectives are being communicated clearly to the company.

          ACSI notifies our members of the upcoming engagements and asks for feedback and participation in both the meetings and on the agenda set for the meeting.

07.4. Describe how you adapt your engagement style to ensure you maintain a constructive relationship with the company that you are engaging with.

          ACSI endeavours to ensure all its meeting are held in a non-confrontational manner, while still communicating any issues it has. Follow-up communications or discussions are often had on more contentious matters, particularly post-meeting where ACSI has recommended its clients oppose a particular resolution.

In some circumstances, ACSI may ask the company to arrange a separate briefing by with board members or executive specialists for its members on specific matters of interest/concern, to allow unfiltered examination of the issues and chance for both sides to communicate openly.

SS 08. Monitoring engagements

08.1. Indicate your method for monitoring engagements over time.

08.2. Indicate whether you provide clients with recommendations for next steps.

08.3. Describe the format that you typically use to provide your recommendations to the clients.

          ACSI provides recommendations on company specific issues throughout the year for all ASX300 companies in ACSI’s voting recommendations at AGMs, and in papers for the Member Council.

The progress for priority companies is also reported in formal reports, twice yearly, to the Member Council followed by all members.

SS 09. Identifying emerging ESG issues (Private)

SS 10. Defining and measuring success

10.1. Describe how you define success when evaluating/reviewing engagements on ESG factors.

          Success is when a company modifies it behaviors or practices in a way which meet, all or in part, ACSI’s pre-determined objectives for the engagement.

10.2. Describe how you measure success when evaluating/reviewing engagements on ESG factors.

          “Success” is measured differently, depending on the objectives set. In areas such as gender diversity at board level, appointment of a woman director – or a guarantee from the company that one will be appointed – is easily measurable.
Where more qualitative changes are sought, such as the setting of policies and greater detail in public disclosure on labour and human rights issue, or how a company is responding to (and reporting on) the challenges of climate change effects on its business, achievement of objectives will often require several meetings and several staged steps towards “best practice”.
Similarly, changes in remuneration practices often require a longer time horizon because of the wider-ranging effect of altering structures.

10.3. Describe the actions you take (or recommend your client to take) if the engagement on ESG factors has not met the success criteria.

          ACSI would communicate again with the relevant organisation, either in written form or by telephone, to detail where it believes the company is not meeting objectives and, usually, explains that will result on a negative voting recommendation on relevant resolutions at the next shareholder meeting.

SS 11. Companies changing practices/behavior following engagement (Private)

SS 12. Publishing engagement outcomes

12.1. Indicate whether you publish your engagement outcomes.

12.2. Indicate whether you enable your clients to publish your engagement outcomes.

SS 13. Engaging with policy makers and industry bodies (Private)