This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Pensioenfonds PNO Media

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Strategy and Governance » Promoting responsible investment

Promoting responsible investment

SG 09. Collaborative organisations / initiatives

09.1. Select the collaborative organisation and/or initiatives of which your organisation is a member or in which it participated during the reporting year, and the role you played.

Select all that apply

Your organisation’s role in the initiative during the reporting period (see definitions)

Provide a brief commentary on the level of your organisation’s involvement in the initiative. [Optional]

Your organisation’s role in the initiative during the reporting period (see definitions)

Provide a brief commentary on the level of your organisation’s involvement in the initiative. [Optional]

Through our engagement provider Hermes

Your organisation’s role in the initiative during the reporting period (see definitions)

Provide a brief commentary on the level of your organisation’s involvement in the initiative. [Optional]

          IMVB Covenant, collaboration 70 Dutch pension funds

Your organisation’s role in the initiative during the reporting year (see definitions)

Provide a brief commentary on the level of your organisation’s involvement in the initiative. [Optional]

SG 09.2. Assets managed by PRI signatories

Indicate approximately what percentage (+/- 5%) of your externally managed assets under management are managed by PRI signatories.

100 %

SG 10. Promoting RI independently

10.1. Indicate if your organisation promotes responsible investment, independently of collaborative initiatives.

10.2. Indicate the actions your organisation has taken to promote responsible investment independently of collaborative initiatives. Provide a description of your role in contributing to the objectives of the selected action and the typical frequency of your participation/contribution.


          We discuss better transparancy and disclosure with other Dutch pension funds (among others through the IMVB covenant), our external managers and Hermes EOS. We participate in the yearly Dutch VBDO ESG study.

Frequency of contribution


          We require our external managers to sign the PRI. This plays a role when we select new managers.

Frequency of contribution

10.3. Describe any additional actions and initiatives that your organisation has taken part in during the reporting year to promote responsible investment [Optional]

Our engagement service provider, Hermes EOS, has published case studies on its website, participated in academic research, responded to consultations related to responsible investment and supported the development of stewardship codes.

SG 11. Dialogue with public policy makers or standard setters

11.1. Indicate if your organisation - individually or in collaboration with others - conducted dialogue with public policy makers or regulators in support of responsible investment in the reporting year.

If yes

11.2. Select the methods you have used.

specify description

          Please see additional information for more detail on public policy conducted on our behalf by EOS at Federated Hermes

11.3. Where you have made written submissions (individually or collaboratively) to governments and regulatory authorities, indicate if these are publicly available.

11.4. Provide a brief description of the main topics your organisation has engaged with public policy-makers or regulators on.

EOS at Federated Hermes contributes to the development of policy and best practice on environmental, social and governance matters and shareholder rights to protect and enhance the value of the shareholdings of its clients over the long term.
In 2019, in relation to environmental concerns, Saker Nusseibeh, CEO of Hermes Investment Management, and Bruce Duguid, head of stewardship at EOS, attended a two-day Vatican summit on the energy transition, along with CEOs from major oil companies, asset managers and asset owners. The summit highlighted the need for urgent action on the climate emergency and focused on three key issues: a just transition to a low carbon economy; introducing reliable and meaningful carbon pricing; and transparency in reporting climate risks. Mr Nusseibeh signed two accords on behalf of Hermes on carbon pricing and transparency of financial risks, showing its commitment to taking genuine action on the climate crisis.
EOS is also an active member of the PRI’s Plastics Investor Working Group, advising on strategy and engagement. EOS gave feedback on the research for three PRI reports published in 2019, setting out what investors would find useful. The three reports explore why plastic is a problem, plastic value chain risks and opportunities, and how the plastic landscape is changing. The aim is to help investors identify where and how their portfolios might be exposed to plastic, so they can engage at the corporate and policy levels accordingly.
With regard to social issues, EOS responded to the UK Home Office’s consultation on potential revisions to the Modern Slavery Act and argued for a requirement to report on all six of the currently
recommended areas, instead of adopting a ‘comply or explain’ approach. It supported the creation of a registry to enable stakeholders, including investors, to access companies’ modern slavery statements. It argued that a central registry should include a list of the companies caught by the Act’s reporting requirement, regardless of whether they had submitted a compliant statement.
EOS supported ‘Find It, Fix It, Prevent It’, a collaborative initiative to combat modern slavery. This calls on UK-listed companies to increase their efforts to address this issue and to support the provision of remedy to victims. And as an advisory committee member of the PRI cobalt supply chain collaborative engagement, EOS was the only investor representative to attend an OECD-led field trip to the Democratic Republic of Congo to see first-hand the human rights challenges, particularly around artisanal-scale mining. EOS also participated in an on-site OECD roundtable, sharing its perspective and experience with local and international stakeholders.
In relation to governance, EOS contributed to several reviews and consultations looking at ways to overhaul the UK audit sector, including the Competition and Market Authority’s study, the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy consultation and the Brydon Review. In the consultations EOS expressed its concerns about audit quality, and called for more professional scepticism, with auditors prepared to challenge management, rather than taking a tick-box approach.
In the US, following moves by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to restrict rights relating to shareholder proposals and regulate proxy adviser activity, EOS wrote to the SEC pointing out that proxy advisers are contractual agents of institutional investors, not of the companies who are the subjects of their research.
EOS also joined an Asian Corporate Governance Association delegation to South Korea to engage with regulators, government departments and businesses on ways to improve corporate governance there. During the trip EOS urged stakeholders to do more to stimulate the economy and encourage entrepreneurialism, without diluting corporate governance standards. EOS argued against the proposed introduction of dual-class share structures, which may threaten minority shareholder rights. EOS also expressed the need for clearer guidance on the so-called 5% rule, whereby shareholders with a 5% stake in a company must state if they plan to influence management. The law was conceived as an anti-takeover measure but there are concerns it could make some asset owners reluctant to adopt the country’s stewardship code due to uncertainty about the legitimacy of engaging with companies on corporate governance.