This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

NGS Super Fund

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Indirect – Manager Selection, Appointment and Monitoring » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

SAM 08. Percentage of externally managed assets managed by PRI signatories (Private)


SAM 09. Examples of ESG issues in selection, appointment and monitoring processes

09.1. Provide examples of how ESG issues have been addressed in the manager selection, appointment and/or monitoring process for your organisation during the reporting year.

Topic or issue
          Monitoring
        
Conducted by
Asset class
Scope and process

We use Sustainalytics to identify problem companies in managers portfolios

Outcomes

More informed engagement activities, risk identification / mitigation.

Topic or issue
          Monitoring
        
Conducted by
Asset class
Scope and process

We have mapped our portfolio against the sustainable development goals.

Outcomes

Enhance risk identification and risk mitigation within portfolios.

Topic or issue
          Selection
        
Conducted by
Asset class
Scope and process

We request managers to provide specific examples of where companies have been excluded on ESG grounds and where non-specific examples are given we do not view their ESG process as sufficiently strong to invest.

We have recently appointed an Australian equity manager into our broader portfolio who critically assesses the supply chains of Australian companies and excludes gambling stocks.

We appointed an EM Debt manager who uses ESG factors such as gender inequality as a ran input for their models. ESG is ingrained in their process and we see their process as aligned with the values of NGS Super.

We divested from a manager due to their portfolio holding tobacco and replaced this with an equivalent tobacco free portfolio.

Outcomes

Enhance risk identification and risk mitigation within portfolios.

09.2. Additional information.


Top