This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Mercy Investment Services, Inc.

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

12.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure that your agreed-upon voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made.

We report annually on proxy voting completed by our service provider in compliance with Mercy proxy voting guidelines (controlling) which incorporate approved standard Catholic voting guidelines used by the provider. This review is done on a monthly basis, allowing close tracking of adherence to policy. If the review determines an item was not voted in alignment with policy, the service provider is contacted for a detailed rationale. Annually, report on the audits of proxy voting guideline compliance is provided to the Social Responsibility Committee. In the event of emerging or new issues that are not addressed by either guidelines or in circumstances of decisions to vote against board member(s), those proxy voting decisions are approved by management as delegated in the proxy voting guidelines.

12.3. Additional information.[Optional]

See proxy voting guidelines and results at https://www.mercyinvestmentservices.org/2020%20Mercy%20Investment%20Services%20Proxy%20Voting%20Guidelines_FINAL.pdf and https://www.mercyinvestmentservices.org/proxy-voting.aspx, respectively.


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme (Not Completed)


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. Indicate the proportion of votes participated in within the reporting year in which where you or the service providers acting on your behalf raised concerns with companies ahead of voting.

15.2. Indicate the reasons for raising your concerns with these companies ahead of voting.

15.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. Indicate the proportion of votes where you, and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicated the rationale to companies for abstaining or voting against management recommendations. Indicate this as a percentage out of all eligible votes.

16.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. For listed equities in which you or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

99.36 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

17.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting on certain holdings

17.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Private)


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal escalation strategy following unsuccessful voting.

19.2. Indicate the escalation strategies used at your organisation following abstentions and/or votes against management.

19.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Private)


Top