This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.


PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Infrastructure » Selection, appointment and monitoring of third-party infrastructure operators


INF 10. ESG issues in selection, appointment and monitoring of third-party operators

10.1. 組織が第三者の事業者の選択、指名やモニタリングにおいてESG問題を含めているかどうかを記載してください。

10.2. 組織が第三者の事業者の選択、指名、モニタリングにESG問題を含めているかどうかを記載してください。

10.3. 組織が設定している第三者の事業者の選定、指名およびモニタリングのプロセス・手法について簡潔に説明してください [任意]

The appointment and monitoring of third-parties is adapted according to the type of project and third parties considered.

For instance, ESG policies are requested and screened for maintenance operators.

For greenfield operations, ESG criteria and provisions requested by public operators are directly transferred and applied to third parties.

For brownfield operations, if additional sub-contracts are deemed necessary, ESG considerations are integrated in selection criteria on a case-by-case basis. 

10.4. 第三者の事業者が組織のインフラ投資のESG問題の管理にどのように貢献しているかを説明してください。 [任意]

The contribution of third-party operators to the management of ESG issues is really linked to the type of project considered : environmental and social objectives are often part of the contracts, for instance :

- for renewable energy projects, third-party operators like engineering offices can directly contribute to fauna monitoring (birds, bats…),
- third-party can re-employ local staff and therefore contribute under a back-to-back obligation,
- third parties can contribute to energy maintenance and therefore to the energy efficiency objectives.