This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.


PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Infrastructure » Post-investment (monitoring and active ownership) » Infrastructure Monitoring and Operations


INF 12. Proportion of assets with ESG performance targets

12.1. 報告年度のインフラ資産の中で、組織や事業者が投資のモニタリングにESG実績を組み入れた割合を記載してください。


12.2. 組織や事業者が通常目標(KPIなど)を設定し、さらにモニタリングしているESG問題を記載し、問題別に例を挙げてください。


          Effective energy consumption (for example, for buildings, kwh/m²/an)
          Induced and avoided carbon emissions
          Impacts on biodiversity: - monitoring and follow-up of local species, particularly birds and bats t, Ground footprint (number of km²), fauna circulation (tunnels and corridors)


          Number of jobs created, thanks to the project, over the long term
          Health safety: accidents on-site (for employees/maintenance staff, for users, for surrounding people)
          Indoor air quality it relevant according to the infrastructure type.


          Treatment of conflicts of interest
          Balance of the board
          Business ethics (existence or not of controversies, audit procedures, etc.)

12.3. 補足情報 [任意]

Our ESG analysis methodology is tailored to each category of project (solar, wind, rail transport, energy services, etc.) to better identify risks and opportunities arising from the key sustainability issues. The criteria disclosed above are only examples that can:

-Be relevant or not, in terms of Sustainability Opportunities, depending on the nature of the project. A mapping of sustainability opportunities, that crosses sectors with sustainability issues has been developed by our in-house RI Research team so as to identify compliant projects.
-Be weighted differently in the ESG risk review, depending on the social /  environmental externalities related to the project and existing levers for improvement.

This targeted ESG research approach enables a focus on relevant criteria and KPIs, which are monitored all along the project (some examples are provided in INF.12.2 above)

INF 13. Proportion of portfolio companies with ESG/sustainability policy

13.1. 組織がESG/サステナビリティに関連するポリシー(または同様のガイドライン)を有するインフラ投資先の割合を追跡しているかどうかを記載してください。

13.2. 組織がESG/サステナビリティに関連するポリシー(または同様のガイドライン)を有するインフラ投資先の割合を記載してください。


13.3. 組織や事業者がインフラ投資先のESG問題の管理にどのように貢献しているかを説明してください。 [任意]

A majority of assets/project companies currently in our portfolio have an explicit sustainable development policy. Within the context of our Renewable Energy undertakings, infrastructure projects mainly defined according to the CSR policies put in place by the parent companies of corporate participating in a project (GDF Suez, Valorem, Holmen, etc.).

It is also worth noticing that most of the sectors in which we invest are inherently related to sustainable development issues and contribute to tackling environmental and/or social challenges (for further information, please refer to OO.INF.03).

INF 14. Type and frequency of reports received from investees

14.1. インフラ投資先に請求するESG問題に関する報告書の種類および頻度、報告書を受領する頻度を記載してください。



          Meetings or calls with projects' operators


          Upon Mirova’s RI analysts’ request

14.2. 補足情報 [任意]

Once the partnership contract has been signed, a monitoring process is set up to measure the project’s impact, by using information gathered from gap analysis and actions undertaken during the project, as well as from annual and punctual reports on the project.

It is also worth noting that our ESG assessment and monitoring process during the management phase includes meetings or calls with the projects’ operators in order to confirm or disprove the initial ESG assessment, and to encourage them to improve the ESG practices as part of our engagement approach