This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

APG Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

エンゲージメント

LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues

エンゲージメントの方法および対話を行う理由を明示して下さい。
エンゲージメントの種類
対話を行う理由​
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
協働的なエンゲージメント
サービスプロバイダーのエンゲージメント

02.4. 補足情報[任意]

In addition to engagement with portfolio companies, we engage external service providers to improve their services and corporate practice. We do so by pro-actively contributing feedback on the quality of the services, data and policies of our service providers.


LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

この指標には新しい設問が追加されています。事前に入力されている回答を精査してください。

03.1. 貴社にはエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を付けるための正式な手順がありますか。

各エンゲージメント種別の特定および優先順位付けに用いる基準を示してください。
エンゲージメント種別
エンゲージメントの特定/優先順位付けに用いる基準
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

その他(具体的に説明してください)

          Relative degree of alignment for pay and effective tax rate for tax engagements.
        

03.3. 補足情報 [任意]

Given the size of APG's equity portfolio universe, we need to consider optimal use of engagement resources, balancing the prospect of achieving successful engagement results from an investment (value creation) and RI policy perspective with other considerations such as market impact and clients' wishes. This requires us to be selective.

The nature of the concern and the gravity of the particular issue:

  • High priority concerns include: violations of the UN Global Compact principles, labour standards controversies, environmental harm, board and committee composition, audit concerns, remuneration concerns.
  • Concerns based on the results of an in-house assessment of companies' policies and practices (inclusion policy).
  • Isolated incidents versus repeated patterns: A one-off incident (for example an oil spill or labour unrest) does not necessarily require engagement. We examine the way management responds to such incidents, and the effectiveness of management systems and other fundamental considerations such as the corporate culture surrounding safety to ensure such an incident won't happen again in the future.
  • Engagements based on concerns related to priority topics and themes in certain sectors on specific client request.

 

Investment impact:

  • Business impact - the likelihood the ESG issue identified may or could materialize into a significant business detriment;
  • Investment relevance - likelihood the ESG issue could impact the share price in the short, medium or long term;
  • Portfolio relevance - a combination of our stake and the company's value in our portfolio;
  • The degree of leverage we believe we have (outlook for success);
  • Size of our stake (% of equity);
  • Relationship with the company;
  • Track record with the company;
  • Wider investor interest in the topic.


The assessment of whether or not to start or join a collaborative engagement is mostly defined on the basis of:

  • whether there are like-minded investors with whom we can collaborate,
  • whether the engagement is in line with our priorities,
  • whether the engagement targets form part of our portfolios, and
  • whether we perceive a group engagement to be the most effective approach in a given situation.

 


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

この指標には新しい設問が追加されています。事前に入力されている回答を精査してください。
貴社のエンゲージメント活動に対して明確な目的を定義しているか示してください。
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
協働的なエンゲージメント

04.2. 補足情報 [任意]

We have developed an in-house centralized knowledge management system (KMS) database in which we track our engagement with companies as well as other relevant research, financial and ESG information. Both the investment teams and the Global Responsible Investment and Governance (GRIG) team have access to this database which ensures sharing of information. We also screen portfolios with respect to the UN Global Compact.
 For each engagement we document the company's name, the engagement issues, our objectives, and whether they have been met or if progress has been made. We also document the engagement intensity-level, whether we are working collaboratively with other investors, the steps taken in terms of dialogues, meetings and written exchanges, and the steps to be taken in future. The KMS is a very successful engagement monitoring tool that is used on a daily basis by GRIG and investment teams.

Engagements with companies on the basis of UN Global Compact violations which could lead to exclusion require sign-off from a board-level committee. Progress of these engagement trajectories is evaluated regularly by this committee.

 


LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

エンゲージメントの成果についてモニタリングまたは検討を行っているか示してください。
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
協働的なエンゲージメント
エンゲージメント活動の進捗状況のモニタリングまたは検討を行うため、以下を行っているか示してください。
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
協働的なエンゲージメント

05.3. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 06. Role in engagement process

06.1. エンゲージメントが不首尾に終わった場合のエスカレーション戦略があるか示してください。

06.2. 不首尾に終わったエンゲージメントの後に貴社が用いるエスカレーション戦略を示してください。

06.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 07. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers

07.1. 貴社のエンゲージメントから得た知見を投資意思決定者と共有しているか示してください。

エンゲージメントの種類

共有する考察
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

07.2. エンゲージメントにより得た情報および知見を投資意思決定者と確実に共有するために用いている慣行を示してください。

07.3. 貴社のエンゲージメントから得た知見を顧客/受益者と共有しているか示してください。

エンゲージメントの種類
共有する考察
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
協働的なエンゲージメント

07.4. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 08. Tracking number of engagements

08.1. 貴社がエンゲージメントの数を追跡しているかどうかを記載してください。

エンゲージメントの種類
エンゲージメントの追跡
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

08.2. 補足情報[任意]

We have developed an in-house centralized knowledge management system (KMS) database in which we track our engagement with companies as well as other relevant research, financial and ESG information. Both the investment teams and the GRIG team have access to this database which ensures sharing of information. We also screen portfolios with respect to the UN Global Compact.

For each engagement we document the company's name, the engagement issues, our objectives, and whether they have been met or if progress has been made. We also document the engagement intensity-level, whether we are working collaboratively with other investors, the steps taken in terms of dialogues, meetings and written exchanges, and the steps to be taken in future. The KMS is a very successful engagement monitoring tool that is used on a daily basis by GRIG and investment teams.

Engagements with companies on the basis of UN Global Compact violations which could lead to exclusion require sign-off from a board-level committee. Progress of these engagement trajectories is evaluated regularly by this committee.


Top