This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Jackson Square Partners

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions


LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. (委任状による)議決権行使を通常どのように決定しているかを明示して下さい。



12.2. 合意された議決権ポリシーがどのように遵守されているかを概観し、ポリシーの例外が適用された場合(該当する場合)のアプローチの詳細を示してください。

Jackson Square’s default position for proxy voting is to comply with the recommendations set forth in the ISS guidelines, which summarizes Jackson Square’s position on various issues and gives a general indication as to how proxies will be voted on each issue.  Although Jackson Square usually votes proxies in accordance with the guidelines, Jackson Square reserves the right to vote certain issues counter the guidelines, if, after a review of the matter, Jackson Square determines that its clients’ best interest would be served by such a vote.   After receiving the proxy statements, ISS reviews the proxy issues and votes them in accordance with the Procedures, which are based on ISS’s proxy voting guidelines. In these circumstances, ISS will review the relevant facts and circumstances and research the issue to determine how the proxy should be voted, so that the proxy is voted in the best interests of the client and pursuant to the guidelines.  Jackson Square assigns a member of the investment team with responsibility for reviewing the proxies for each holding.  As part of the review, the investment team member determines whether to vote proxies in accordance with the guidelines or whether to recommend to the Committee to override the ISS vote recommendation.  When the Proxy Committee has decided to vote contrary to the guidelines, the CCO reviews the instructions against the vote recommendation inputted into ISS to ensure the accuracy of the instructions.

The Committee is responsible for overseeing ISS’s proxy voting activities for Jackson Square’s clients and will attempt to ensure that ISS is voting proxies pursuant to the Procedures. Jackson Square reviews proxies voted to ensure the accuracy of the voting records and that all accounts were voted.  The results of such reviews are discussed during Committee meetings.  As part of the Committee’s oversight of ISS, the Committee periodically reviews ISS’s conflict of interest procedures and any other pertinent procedures or representations from ISS in an attempt to ensure that ISS will make recommendations for voting proxies in an impartial manner and in the best interests of Jackson Square’s clients.   In addition, on an annual basis, the CCO reviews ISS’s proxy voting procedures, disclosures, control reports and Form ADV to assess for any issues that should be escalated to the Committee. 

12.3. 補足情報[任意]

LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 14. Securities lending programme (Not Completed)

LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. 報告年度内に関与した議決権行使のうち、貴社、または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが議決権行使に先立って企業に懸念を表明したものの割合を示してください。

15.2. これらの企業に対し、議決権行使に先立って懸念を表明した理由を示してください。

15.3. 補足情報 [任意]

LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが、議決権行使を棄権する場合、または経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、当該企業にその根拠を伝えた議決権の割合を示してください。これは行使可能な全議決権の中で占める割合とします。

16.2. 貴社が議決権行使を棄権する場合、または経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、企業にその根拠を伝える理由を示してください。

16.3. 貴社が議決権行使を棄権するまたは経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる根拠を伝える場合、この根拠を公表しているか示してください。

16.4. 補足情報[任意]

LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. 貴社やサービスプロバイダーが(代理)投票の指示を発行するマンデートを有している上場株式について、報告年度中に行った投票の割合を記載してください。


100 %


17.3. 補足情報[任意]

LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Not Completed)

LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. 不首尾に終わった議決権行使後の正式なエスカレーション戦略が貴社にあるか示してください。

19.3. 補足情報 [任意]

LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Not Completed)

LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)