This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Mercy

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(委任状による)議決権行使および株主決議

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. (委任状による)議決権行使を通常どのように決定しているかを明示して下さい。

アプローチ

以下に基づいて行う

12.3. 補足情報[任意]

Mercy uses ISS which developed faith-based proxy voting guidelines for Catholic and other Christian religious institutions that are consistent with the objectives of socially responsible shareholders as well as the teachings of Catholicism and Christianity as a whole. On matters of social and environmental impact, the guidelines seek to reflect a broad consensus of the faith-based socially responsible investing community. Generally, ISS takes their frame of reference policies and proposals promulgated by the Catholic Bishops' Pastoral on economics, the Socially Responsible Investment Guidelines adopted by the Bishops, and the policies developed by members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR).


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme

14.1. 貴社では、セキュリティーズレンディングを設定していますか?

14.3. 貴社の証券貸付プログラムで投票の問題にどのように対処しているか示してください。

14.4. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. 報告年度内に関与した議決権行使のうち、貴社、または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが議決権行使に先立って企業に懸念を表明したものの割合を示してください。

15.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが、議決権行使を棄権する場合、または経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、当該企業にその根拠を伝えた議決権の割合を示してください。これは行使可能な全議決権の中で占める割合とします。

16.3. 貴社が議決権行使を棄権するまたは経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる根拠を伝える場合、この根拠を公表しているか示してください。

16.4. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. 貴社やサービスプロバイダーが(代理)投票の指示を発行するマンデートを有している上場株式について、報告年度中に行った投票の割合を記載してください。

1%単位の投票率

100 %

この投票率の計算基準を明記してください

17.3. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

18.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが出した議決権行使に係る指示を追跡しているか示してください。

18.2. 貴社または貴社の代理を務める第三者が出した議決権行使に係る指示のうち、各投票項目の占める割合を示してください。

議決権行使に係る指示の対象
投票の内訳(%)
経営陣の提案に対する賛成票
65 %
経営陣の提案に対する反対票
35 %
棄権
0 %
100%

18.3. 貴社が経営陣の提案に対する反対票を投じたケースにおいて、貴社がエンゲージメントを行った企業の占める割合を示してください。

0

18.4. 補足情報 [任意]

Mercy Investment Team does not engage with the companies directly when ISS voted against management recommendations.


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. 不首尾に終わった議決権行使後の正式なエスカレーション戦略が貴社にあるか示してください。

19.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions

20.1. 貴社が報告年度中に、直接もしくはサービスプロバイダーを介して、ESG株主決議を提出または共同提出したか示してください。

20.7. 補足情報[任意] 


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities

21.1. 報告年度に貴社またはサービスプロバイダーが実行した(委任状による)議決権行使の例を提供してください。

ESGトピック
Human rights
意思決定者
目的

Individual shareholder filed a precatory proposal requesting company to implement procedures to prevent or recommend against investments in companies that contribute to genocide or other crimes against humanity. 

対象範囲およびプロセス

ISS vote FOR this proposal is warranted for the following reasons:* Shareholders would benefit from careful monitoring of Franklin Resource's investment choices, given the inherent or potential reputational risks related to investments in high-risk markets;* Adoption of the proposal would result in more robust communication regarding the fund's policies and oversight mechanisms related to the incorporation of non-financial risk management factors into investment decision-making processes.

結果
ESGトピック
Diversity
意思決定者
目的

Votes AGAINST incumbent nominees Stephen Zelnak Jr., Allan Merrill, Elizabeth Acton, Laurent Alpert, Brian Beazer, Peter (Pete) Leemputte, Peter Orser, Norma Provencio and Danny Shepherd are warranted for lack of diversity on the board. 

対象範囲およびプロセス

Catholic Advisory Services believes that it is in the best interests of shareholders for management to give serious consideration to issues concerning board diversity. In cases where the board lacks at least one female and one racially diverse director, and the board is not at least 30 percent diverse, Catholic Advisory Services recommends that shareholders vote against the entire board, with the exception of new nominees.

結果
ESGトピック
Executive Remuneration
意思決定者
目的

ISS voted against proposal by management to ratify executive officer's compensation.

対象範囲およびプロセス

A vote AGAINST this proposal is warranted due to the following concerns: A majority of equity awards to the CEO are not tied to performance-contingent pay elements; and high CEO pay relative to company performance compared to the company’s peers.

結果
ESGトピック
General ESG
意思決定者
目的

A vote FOR the director nominees for Sotheby's is warranted as a majority of the board comprises independent directors, the key board committees are independent and there is both gender and racial diversity on the board. 

対象範囲およびプロセス

The company has adopted a majority vote standard (of shares cast) for the election of directors with a plurality carve-out for contested elections, and has a director resignation policy in its bylaws/charter.

結果

21.2. 補足情報[任意]


Top