This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Fennia Varainhoito Oy (Delisted)

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Indirect – Manager Selection, Appointment and Monitoring » Outputs and outcomes


SAM 08. Percentage of externally managed assets managed by PRI signatories (Private)

SAM 09. Examples of ESG issues in selection, appointment and monitoring processes

09.1. 報告年度において、運用会社の選定、指名やモニタリングプロセスの過程で、ESG問題がどのように対処されているかを示す事例を挙げてください。

          Incorporating ESG more formally into manager DD and manager monitoring process

In 2018 we performed for the first time comprehensive analysis on ESG factors on all managers used in our investment strategies. In 2019 we continued this work and we built up the  ESG questionaire for managers. This questionaire is sent to managers annually and also as a part of our DD work when selecting new potential manager. The questionaire includes following issues:

Whether the manager is a UN PRI signatory, if they disclose the UN PRI or other ESG-ratings for themselves, are there ESG-principles for investing activities and can portfolio managers clearly explain how these are put into practice, what ESG-analysis do they perform on companies and what data sources and internal resources do they have for this, what is their stance on active ownership and positive influencing, what is included in their exclusion lists and how do they define controversial weapons,  do they have a climate strategy and carbon footprint measurements, do they check that companies are not in breach with the 10 principles of the UN Global Compact does company specific analysis show sufficient consideration given to governance aspects, and how do they report on ESG including the risks and opportunities.


In many cases, managers have started to put more emphasis on ESG-factors after discussions we have had on the topic.

09.2. 補足情報 [任意]