This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Redpoint Investment Management

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(委任状による)議決権行使および株主決議

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. (委任状による)議決権行使を通常どのように決定しているかを明示して下さい。

アプローチ

以下に基づいて行う

12.2. 合意された議決権ポリシーがどのように遵守されているかを概観し、ポリシーの例外が適用された場合(該当する場合)のアプローチの詳細を示してください。

The relevant Portfolio Manager(s) determine voting decisions (or recommendations to clients regarding our view on a particular vote) in line with our Proxy Voting Policy.  Our policy intentionally does not pre-determine a response to every voting circumstance.  Where a decision cannot be made that is clearly in line with a specific element of our policy, that decision is debated within the Redpoint investment management team with final decision resting with Chief Investment Officer.

More contentious issues, and all instances where it is envisaged that votes will be cast against management, are also debated within the Redpoint investment management team with final decision resting with Chief Investment Officer.

All decisions are shred between decision makers and compliance.

12.3. 補足情報[任意]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for voting recommendations on contentious issues.


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme

14.1. 貴社では、セキュリティーズレンディングを設定していますか?

14.2. 貴社がセキュリティーズレンディングをしていない理由を説明してください。(最大500語)

All of our mandates explicitly preclude us from lending securities, either because the client has a policy not to lend securtieis or participates in a custodian or third party delivered lending program.

14.4. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. 報告年度内に関与した議決権行使のうち、貴社、または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが議決権行使に先立って企業に懸念を表明したものの割合を示してください。

15.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが、議決権行使を棄権する場合、または経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、当該企業にその根拠を伝えた議決権の割合を示してください。これは行使可能な全議決権の中で占める割合とします。

16.4. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. 貴社やサービスプロバイダーが(代理)投票の指示を発行するマンデートを有している上場株式について、報告年度中に行った投票の割合を記載してください。

17.2. 一定の株式保有分について議決権を行使しない理由を説明して下さい:

17.3. 補足情報[任意]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for our views on contentious issues. When requested, we communicate those views to the relevant company bafore and/or after our client votes.


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

18.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが出した議決権行使に係る指示を追跡しているか示してください。

18.4. 補足情報 [任意]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for our views on contentious issues. When requested, we communicate those views to the relevant company bafore and/or after our client votes.


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. 不首尾に終わった議決権行使後の正式なエスカレーション戦略が貴社にあるか示してください。

19.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)


Top