This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Redpoint Investment Management

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

12.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure that your agreed-upon voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made.

The relevant Portfolio Manager(s) determine voting decisions (or recommendations to clients regarding our view on a particular vote) in line with our Proxy Voting Policy.  Our policy intentionally does not pre-determine a response to every voting circumstance.  Where a decision cannot be made that is clearly in line with a specific element of our policy, that decision is debated within the Redpoint investment management team with final decision resting with Chief Investment Officer.

More contentious issues, and all instances where it is envisaged that votes will be cast against management, are also debated within the Redpoint investment management team with final decision resting with Chief Investment Officer.

All decisions are shred between decision makers and compliance.

12.3. Additional information.[Optional]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for voting recommendations on contentious issues.


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme

14.1. Does your organisation have a securities lending programme?

14.2. Describe why your organisation does not lend securities.

All of our mandates explicitly preclude us from lending securities, either because the client has a policy not to lend securtieis or participates in a custodian or third party delivered lending program.

14.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. Indicate the proportion of votes participated in within the reporting year in which where you or the service providers acting on your behalf raised concerns with companies ahead of voting.

15.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. Indicate the proportion of votes where you, and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicated the rationale to companies for abstaining or voting against management recommendations. Indicate this as a percentage out of all eligible votes.

16.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. For listed equities in which you or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

17.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting on certain holdings

17.3. Additional information. [Optional]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for our views on contentious issues. When requested, we communicate those views to the relevant company bafore and/or after our client votes.


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

18.1. Indicate whether you track the voting instructions that you or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

18.4. Additional information. [Optional]

Redpoint maintains a proxy voting policy, but all of our current clients exercise proxy votes themselves. We respond to numerous requests from those clients for our views on contentious issues. When requested, we communicate those views to the relevant company bafore and/or after our client votes.


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal escalation strategy following unsuccessful voting.

19.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)


Top