This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.


PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Organisational Overview » Peering questions


OO LE 01. Breakdown of listed equity investments by passive and active strategies (Not Applicable)

OO LE 02. Reporting on strategies that are <10% of actively managed listed equities (Not Applicable)

OO FI 01. Breakdown of fixed income investments by passive and active strategies

FI 01.1. 組織内で運用されている債券の内訳をアクティブ戦略とパッシブ戦略で分けてください。

Corporate (financial)
0 パッシブ
0 アクティブ—数量的(クオンツ)
100 アクティブ—ファンダメンタルおよび・もしくはその他のアクティブ戦略
Total 100%

FI 01.2. 補足情報 [任意]

Cordiant believes that proper respect for ESG principles can optimize investment strategies, risk management, responsiveness in volatile markets, reduce costs for all parties engaged in investment activities, as well as strengthen stakeholder relations and improve a borrower’s brand, reputation, and profitability.


Cordiant explicitly integrates ESG considerations into the investment process. Additionally, critical considerations such as gender are factored into our ESG Risk & Impact Management System, which supports and aligns with our robust investment value-creation processes. ESG risk management is integrated throughout the investment process and is viewed as an important risk mitigant, ensuring that companies in which Cordiant invests comply with appropriate laws and policies.

When looking to make an investment, Cordiant seeks to develop a plan allowing the company to secure meaningful, measurable, and independently verifiable development outcomes. Focus here can highlight practices that need to be improved even as it reduces investment risk. Cordiant employs an effective and transparent evaluation methodology and risk analysis process to identify companies with a sustainable competitive advantage.

We analyse ESG using internationally recognised environmental, social, and governance standards. The present Responsible Investment Policy & Technical Framework integrates our ESG risk and impact management process. It was drafted after extensive interactions with standard setters in the areas of ESG and impact investing, including Commonwealth Development Corporation (CDC), the European Investment Bank, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Inter-American Investment Corporation (IIC), MIGA, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

OO FI 02. Reporting on strategies that are <10% of actively managed fixed income (Not Applicable)

OO FI 03. Fixed income breakdown by market and credit quality

この指標は、「報告義務、自主開示」から「必須」に変更されました。 この指標に対する貴組織の回答は、透明性レポートに掲載されます。 この「必須」への変更により、より良い分析とピアリングが可能になります。
社債および証券化債券の投資適格およびハイイールド証券のおよその内訳(+/- 5%)を示してください。
投資適格(+/- 5%)
ハイイールド証券(+/- 5%)

FI 03.3. 補足情報 [任意]


OO SAM 01. Breakdown of externally managed investments by passive and active strategies (Not Applicable)

OO PE 01. Breakdown of private equity investments by strategy (Not Applicable)

OO PE 02. Typical level of ownership in private equity investments (Not Applicable)

OO PR 01. Breakdown of property investments (Not Applicable)

OO PR 02. Breakdown of property assets by management (Not Applicable)

OO PR 03. Largest property types (Not Applicable)

OO INF 01. Breakdown of infrastructure investments (Not Applicable)

OO INF 02. Breakdown of infrastructure assets by management (Not Applicable)

OO INF 03. Largest infrastructure sectors (Not Applicable)

OO HF 01. Breakdown of hedge funds investments by strategies (Not Applicable)