This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Ellerston Capital Limited

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues

Indicate the method of engagement, giving reasons for the interaction.

Type of engagement

Reason for interaction

Individual / Internal staff engagements
Collaborative engagements
Service provider engagements

02.4. Additional information. [Optional]

We have recently started collaborative engagement, becoming a signatory of Climate Action 100+. We are already a support investor on one Australian engagement and will shortly be contributing to engagements with Asia Pacific companies.


LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagements.

Indicate the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagements for each type of engagement.
Type of engagement
Criteria used to identify/prioritise engagements
Individual / Internal staff engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

specify

          We engage with every company that we invest in. After initial engagement we prioritize further engagement according to the materiality of the issues we identify.
        

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.
Indicate whether you define specific objectives for your organisation’s engagement activities.
Individual / Internal staff engagements

04.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Often it is the basic level of engagement (such as requests for further detailed information or answers to questions that arise from initial engagement) that leads to the identification of material ESG risks and opportunities. In these cases, it is not possible to define specific objectives (other than the need for meaningful engagement) ahead of knowing what the problem and potential solution may be.


LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

Indicate whether you monitor and/or review engagement outcomes.
Individual / Internal staff engagements
Indicate whether you do any of the following to monitor and/or review the progress of engagement activities.
Individual / Internal staff engagements

05.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 06. Role in engagement process

06.1. Indicate whether your organisation has an escalation strategy when engagements are unsuccessful.

06.2. Indicate the escalation strategies used at your organisation following unsuccessful engagements.

06.3. Additional information. [Optional]

All of the strategies indicated above would be considered in the event we needed to escalate, some of which we have not yet used. However, which strategy is used and the timing is very much decided on a case-by-case basis.


LEA 07. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 08. Tracking number of engagements

08.1. Indicate whether you track the number of your engagement activities.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements
Individual/Internal staff engagements​

08.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Company engagements, rationale and outcomes are recorded centrally and reported to clients in accordance with their requirements, which vary by mandate.   


Top