This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

SEI Investments Company

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

12.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure that your agreed-upon voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made.

https://seic.com/en-gb/about-us/corporate-profile/corporate-social-responsibility/stewardship-code

Our proxy research and voting services for our Ireland-based European investments is carried out by BMO reo. The approach seeks to ensure an empowered and effective board and management team; approrpiate checks and balances; effective internal controls and risk management; promoting a culture of transpaerncy and accountability; compensation that rewards long-term value creation; protecting the rights and interests of all shareholders. The policy takes into account local practices and is applied in a pragmatic fashion that reflects an understanding of local and international practices. For companies identified as priorities for engagement, where there are unusual circumstances or topics being voted on, or where we have signficant holdings, voting research and recommendatoins are escalated for additional  review by BMO reo, and when applicable, exceptions to the policy may be made. 

For our US and Canadian investment strategies, proxy voting and research are carried out by Glass Lewis. Each year we review changes to the voting guidelines, as applicable. Across Canada, and by request in the United States, proxy research and voting is aligned to Glass Lewis' ESG Policy. 

12.3. Additional information.[Optional]


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme (Private)


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. Indicate the proportion of votes participated in within the reporting year in which where you or the service providers acting on your behalf raised concerns with companies ahead of voting.

15.2. Indicate the reasons for raising your concerns with these companies ahead of voting.

15.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. Indicate the proportion of votes where you, and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicated the rationale to companies for abstaining or voting against management recommendations. Indicate this as a percentage out of all eligible votes.

16.2. Indicate the reasons why your organisation would communicate to companies, the rationale for abstaining or voting against management recommendations.

16.3. In cases where your organisation does communicate the rationale for abstaining or voting against management recommendations, indicate whether this rationale is made public.

16.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. For listed equities in which you or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

98 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

17.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting on certain holdings

17.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Private)


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal escalation strategy following unsuccessful voting.

19.2. Indicate the escalation strategies used at your organisation following abstentions and/or votes against management.

19.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Private)


Top