This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Gresham House plc

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses

You are in Confidence building measures » Confidence building measures

Confidence building measures

CM1 01. Assurance, verification, or review

01.1. Indicate whether the reported information you have provided for your PRI Transparency Report this year has undergone:

01.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          All our PRI submissions have been reviewed and verified by our senior team including our COO,  Head of Distribution, fund managers and investment teams and with corresponding support from others on the Board as needed. While we have not sought third party assurance in a formal manner this year, we have used expert advisory support from a third party who has been critical in helping us mature our RI processes and to drive meaningful value. This has included an audit of all our activities and functions - and how they interact with our sustainable investment system, including policy commitments, processes and outcomes. This has given us confidence that our responses to the PRI are robust. As our approach evolves further, including the production of a standalone Sustainable Investment report, we will carefully consider the merits of commissioning third party assurance.

CM1 02. Assurance of last year`s PRI data

02.1. We undertook third party assurance on last year’s PRI Transparency Report

02.3. Additional information [OPTIONAL]


CM1 03. Other confidence building measures

03.1. We undertake confidence building measures that are unspecific to the data contained in our PRI Transparency Report:

03.2. Which scheme?

% of total AUM the scheme applies

03.5. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          Since becoming a PRI signatory in 2018, we have been focused on ensuring that our internal processes are robust, efficient and drive meaningful value. We understand the potential importance of third-party accreditation, certification or labelling and will continue to evaluate which of these are most relevant to our organisation and/or specific asset classes. We are committed to reviewing this as our approaches mature and will consider further where we believe this would add value to our Sustainable Investment outcomes for us, our investors and our investee businesses.

CM1 04. Assurance of this year`s PRI data

04.1. Do you plan to conduct third party assurance of this year`s PRI Transparency report?

04.3. Additional information [OPTIONAL]


CM1 05. External assurance (Not Applicable)

CM1 06. Assurance or internal audit

06.1. Provide details of the third party assurance of RI related processes, and/or details of the internal audit conducted by internal auditors of RI related processes (that have been reported to the PRI this year)

What RI processes have been assured


          All GH Sustainable Investing Policies

When was the process assurance completed(dd/ mm/yy)


Assurance standard used


          Internal Audit

06.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]


CM1 07. Internal verification

07.1. Indicate who has reviewed/verified internally the whole - or selected data of the - PRI Transparency Report . and if this applies to selected data please specify what data was reviewed

Who has conducted the verification

Sign-off or review of responses

Sign-off or review of responses


          Sustainable Investing Committee
Review of all the responses

07.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          All sections of our submission have been reviewed and signed off by members of the Gresham House Management Committee (ManCo) or members of the Gresham House Asset Management board and source data has also been reviewed and confirmed during this process. The final outputs have been signed off by our COO.