This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Panarchy Partners

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(委任状による)議決権行使および株主決議

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. (委任状による)議決権行使を通常どのように決定しているかを明示して下さい。

アプローチ

以下に基づいて行う

12.2. 合意された議決権ポリシーがどのように遵守されているかを概観し、ポリシーの例外が適用された場合(該当する場合)のアプローチの詳細を示してください。

Proxy voting is an important part of Panarchy Partner’s stewardship and governance as a long-term stakeholder of a company. We perform our voting based on our fiduciary duty to our clients ensuring that our Panvestments create a sustainable future for all. We ensure that all our votes are in adherence to our Panvest Philosophy and framework on the four forms of capital. We also vote to ensure that good governance is maintained at the board level and ensure that boards remain accountable on a wide variety of measures such as diversity, transparency, alignment of interests, compensation structures, financial, social, human and environmental metrics, policies and disclosures.

We carefully consider and review our voting for each of our Panvestments. In general, we look for: 

Board Quality: i) Independence & Diversity, ii) Qualifications and Tenure of each board member, iii) Long-term Compensation Policies and KPIs that include non-financial capital for senior management, and iv) Transparency 

Capital Allocation: i) Decision-making that ensures a long-term high-return on capital, and ii) Avoids negative externalities for stakeholders

Environmental Risks: i) Adequate Consideration, Reporting and Disclosures that ensure the sustainable health and growth of the company and safe-guard the health of the planet.   

Human Capital: i) Policies that support human capital industry specific metrics such as diversity and inclusion, health and wellbeing and safety and treat human capital as an asset rather than expense. 

Social Capital: i) Maintaining and safe-guarding the company’s license to operate and reputation.

12.3. 補足情報[任意]


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme (Private)


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. 報告年度内に関与した議決権行使のうち、貴社、または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが議決権行使に先立って企業に懸念を表明したものの割合を示してください。

15.3. 補足情報 [任意]

We have not been called to any AGM yet as our fund launch was only in April 2019.


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. 貴社または貴社の代理を務めるサービスプロバイダーが、議決権行使を棄権する場合、または経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、当該企業にその根拠を伝えた議決権の割合を示してください。これは行使可能な全議決権の中で占める割合とします。

16.4. 補足情報[任意]

We have not been called to any AGM yet as our fund launch was only in April 2019.


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. 貴社やサービスプロバイダーが(代理)投票の指示を発行するマンデートを有している上場株式について、報告年度中に行った投票の割合を記載してください。

1%単位の投票率

0 %

この投票率の計算基準を明記してください

17.2. 一定の株式保有分について議決権を行使しない理由を説明して下さい:

We have not attended any AGM yet as our fund has only launched on 01 April 2019, so none of the AGM's have been called yet for any of our investments. As and when they do, we will attend to voting accordingly.

17.3. 補足情報[任意]

We do track and monitor the voting at AGM's of our investments. However, as the fund was launched on 1 April 2019, the AGM cycle for the year has not been called. Next year onwards, we will be able to report on this indicator.


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Private)


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. 不首尾に終わった議決権行使後の正式なエスカレーション戦略が貴社にあるか示してください。

19.3. 補足情報 [任意]

We have not encountered any unsuccessful voting yet, as the AGM's of our investments have not been called yet. Next year onwards, we will be able to report on this indicator.


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Private)


Top