This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Momentum Metropolitan Life Ltd

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Indirect – Manager Selection, Appointment and Monitoring » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

SAM 08. Percentage of externally managed assets managed by PRI signatories (Private)


SAM 09. Examples of ESG issues in selection, appointment and monitoring processes

09.1. Provide examples of how ESG issues have been addressed in the manager selection, appointment and/or monitoring process for your organisation during the reporting year.

Topic or issue
          Governance concern.  The investment manager acknowledged that their existing board is not independent.
        
Conducted by
Asset class
Scope and process

Our company monitors the appointed investment managers on an ongoing basis.  The manager research team will monitor the investment managers on a quarterly basis and flag any concerns that might arise to the operational risk team.  When the investment manager board became a concern, the investment team's risk team arranged an onsite visit with the objective to address the non-independence of the board of the investment management company. 

Outcomes

The investment manager underwent a process of reviewing their current board structure.  Two non-executive members have since been appointed.  They also arranged subsequent meetings to provide feedback as they resolved our concern.  The investment manager also created a risk department and the current compliance function will report into the board.  This will address the investment compliance monitoring concerns raised in terms of the lack of independence on the board.

09.2. Additional information.


Top