This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

CI Investments Inc.

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

12.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

          Voting decisions are made by the portfolio managers, who may utilize research material from our service provider or other supporting material provided by the companies.
        

12.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure that your agreed-upon voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made.

CI Investments' Compliance Department conducts periodic monitoring of the Proxy Voting Policy at least annually to determine adherence.Each Portfolio Manager is required to confirm that they have read, understood and complied with the policy.

12.3. Additional information.[Optional]


LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Securities lending programme (Private)


LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

15.1. Indicate the proportion of votes participated in within the reporting year in which where you or the service providers acting on your behalf raised concerns with companies ahead of voting.

15.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

16.1. Indicate the proportion of votes where you, and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicated the rationale to companies for abstaining or voting against management recommendations. Indicate this as a percentage out of all eligible votes.

16.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

17.1. For listed equities in which you or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

92 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

17.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting on certain holdings

- Securities are sold prior to the deadline date

- Portfolio Managers do not agree with the ballot options and choose to take no action or refrain from voting

- Restricted markets that may require registration of shares prior to voting which restrict shares from trading; portfolio managers do not want to restrict the shares from trading, therefore, they will take no action on such ballots

17.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

18.1. Indicate whether you track the voting instructions that you or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

18.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf have issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
92 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
7 %
Abstentions
1 %
100%

18.3. In cases where your organisation voted against management recommendations, indicate the percentage of companies which you have engaged.

0

18.4. Additional information. [Optional]

Regarding LEA 18.3

This information is not currently tracked.


LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

19.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal escalation strategy following unsuccessful voting.

19.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions (Private)


LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)


Top