Public HTML RI reports - PRI reporting framework 2020

Fonds de réserve pour les retraites - FRR

PRI reporting framework 2020

Basic information [OO 01 - 09] Asset class implementation gateway indicators [OO 10 - 12] Peering questions [OO LE 01 - HF 01]

Strategy and Governance

Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Outsourcing to fiduciary managers and investment consultants [SG 12] ESG issues in asset allocation [SG 13 - 15] Asset class implementation not reported in other modules [SG 16 - 17] Innovation [SG 18] Communication [SG 19]

Indirect – Manager Selection, Appointment and Monitoring

Listed Equity and Fixed Income Strategies [SAM 01] Selection [SAM 02 - 03] Appointment [SAM 04] Monitoring [SAM 05 - 07] Outputs and outcomes [SAM 08 - 09]

Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership

Overview [LEA 01] Engagement [LEA 02 - 08]

Confidence building measures

Confidence building measures [CM1 01 - 07]

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 09. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort

Indicate the proportion of companies in your listed equities portfolio with which your organisation engaged during the reporting year.

	We did not complete any engagements in the reporting year.	Number of companies engaged (avoid double counting, see explanatory notes)	Proportion of companies engaged with, out of total listed equities portfolio
Individual / Internal staff engagements		13	5
Collaborative engagements		200	5

09.2. Indicate the breakdown of engagements conducted within the reporting year by the number of interactions (including interactions made on your behalf).

No. of interactions with a company	% of engagements
One interaction	>76% 51-75% 11-50% 1-10% None
2 to 3 interactions	>76% 51-75% 11-50% 1-10% None
More than 3 interactions	>76% 51-75% 11-50% 1-10% None
Total	100%

09.3. Indicate the percentage of your collaborative engagements in which you were the leading organisation during the reporting year.

Type of engagement	% leading role
Collaborative engagements	>50% 10-50% <10% None

09.5. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 10. Engagement methods

10.1. Indicate which of the following your engagement involved.

Letters and emails to companies

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Meetings and/or calls with board/senior management

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Meetings and/or calls with the CSR, IR or other management

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Visits to operations

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Visits to supplier(s) in supplier(s) from the company’s supply chain

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Participation in roadshows

In a minority of cases

In a majority of cases

In all cases

Other

10.2. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 11. Examples of ESG engagements

11.1. Provide examples of the engagements that your organisation or your service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Add Example 1

ESG Topic	Climate Change\|General ESG\|Sustainability reporting Executive Remuneration Climate Change Human rights Company leadership issues Pollution General ESG Diversity Shareholder rights Health and Safety Sustainability reporting Water risks Labour practices and supply chain management Anti-bribery and corruption Deforestation Aggressive tax planning Cyber security Other governance Plastics Other
Conducted by
Objectives	We are engaging companies to: Curb emissions Improve governance and Strengthen climate-related financial disclosures.
Scope and Process	Climate Action 100+ investors have committed to engage with the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters to improve their climate performance and ensure transparent disclosure of emissions.
Outcomes

Add Example 2

ESG Topic	Human rights\|Health and Safety\|Labour practices and supply chain management Executive Remuneration Climate Change Human rights Company leadership issues Pollution General ESG Diversity Shareholder rights Health and Safety Sustainability reporting Water risks Labour practices and supply chain management Anti-bribery and corruption Deforestation Aggressive tax planning Cyber security Other governance Plastics Other
Conducted by
Objectives	Discussions will be structured along the following topics, with more emphasis on impact this time around. Increased transparency: more communication on the structure of company supply chains, their initiatives and progress Social risk mapping: better understanding of the risks linked to the supply chain, where companies are and how big the negative impacts could be Enhanced relationship with the suppliers: development of longer-term relationships that starts with the company's buying practices Multi-stakeholder initiatives: a systemic approach to addressing issues that the industry as a whole faces
Scope and Process	Textile sector
Outcomes

Add Example 3

Add Example 4

Add Example 5

Add Example 6

Add Example 7

Add Example 8

Add Example 9

Add Example 10

11.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Previous Section Next Section