This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Confidence building measures » Confidence building measures

信頼醸成措置

CM1 01. Assurance, verification, or review

01.1. 本年度のPRI 透明性レポート を対象に提供いただく報告情報が以下項目にある各プロセスを経たものであるかどうかを明示してください:

01.2. 補足情報 [任意]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

CM1 02. Assurance of last year`s PRI data

02.1. 昨年度のPRI 透明性レポートに関しては、第三者による独立した保証を取り付けている

02.3. 補足情報 [任意]

          
        

CM1 03. Other confidence building measures

03.1. PRI 透明性レポートに含まれているデータに限定せず、信頼醸成措置を定めている。:

03.2. どのスキームですか?

スキームが適用される資産の総AUMに占める割合

          Third Party Green Building Certifications 50 - 70% of the GAV.
        

03.5. 補足情報 [任意]

          
        

CM1 04. Assurance of this year`s PRI data

04.1. 本年度のPRI透明性レポートの保証を予定している

04.3. 補足情報 [任意]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

CM1 05. External assurance (Not Applicable)


CM1 06. Assurance or internal audit (Not Applicable)


CM1 07. Internal verification

07.1. PRI透明性レポート 全体(またはその中から選択されたデータ)を内部で見直した、または検証した者を示し、選択されたデータにこれが適用される場合には、どのデータを見直したか具体的に記入してください。

検証実施者

具体的に記入してください

          Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT). SILT is a cross-regional, cross-functional group of senior leaders across J.P. Morgan Asset Management and comprised of two distinct 19-member working groups tasked with building our sustainable investing platform globally. The ESG Data & Research Group, comprised of portfolio managers and analysts, seeks to continually enhance our ESG integration framework, and is in charge of reviewing our response to PRI.
        

07.2. 補足情報 [任意]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

Top