This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Confidence building measures » Confidence building measures

Confidence building measures

CM1 01. Assurance, verification, or review

01.1. Indicate whether the reported information you have provided for your PRI Transparency Report this year has undergone:

01.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

CM1 02. Assurance of last year`s PRI data

02.1. We undertook third party assurance on last year’s PRI Transparency Report

02.3. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          
        

CM1 03. Other confidence building measures

03.1. We undertake confidence building measures that are unspecific to the data contained in our PRI Transparency Report:

03.2. Which scheme?

% of total AUM the scheme applies

          Third Party Green Building Certifications 50 - 70% of the GAV.
        

03.5. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          
        

CM1 04. Assurance of this year`s PRI data

04.1. Do you plan to conduct third party assurance of this year`s PRI Transparency report?

04.3. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

CM1 05. External assurance (Not Applicable)


CM1 06. Assurance or internal audit (Not Applicable)


CM1 07. Internal verification

07.1. Indicate who has reviewed/verified internally the whole - or selected data of the - PRI Transparency Report . and if this applies to selected data please specify what data was reviewed

Who has conducted the verification

specify

          Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT). SILT is a cross-regional, cross-functional group of senior leaders across J.P. Morgan Asset Management and comprised of two distinct 19-member working groups tasked with building our sustainable investing platform globally. The ESG Data & Research Group, comprised of portfolio managers and analysts, seeks to continually enhance our ESG integration framework, and is in charge of reviewing our response to PRI.
        

07.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

          Each asset class module was prepared by investment professionals who are responsible for the asset classes represented by the modules. The modules were then reviewed by the applicable senior decision maker for each module, members of the Sustainable Investment Leadership Team (SILT), the Sustainable Investing team, and representatives from Legal team. The modules were also shared with the Asset Management Operating Committee prior to submission. We have discussed our process for internal review of the modules with a representative from PRI in 2018 who indicated that J.P. Morgan Asset Management should check “internal verification/review” given the process that J.P. Morgan Asset Management used to prepare and review the submission. Please note that although we believe we employed a careful review process, the information including without limitation any underlying data or account information included in the submission has not been audited, tested or verified (as such term may be understood as to confirm or prove to be true).
        

Top