Fund manager agreed to share in-depth detail of their investment process and decision-making criteria around how they weigh E, S, and G criteria. In this specific example, the fund manager worked to justify why the environmental criteria associated with a certain holding outweighed its status as a laggard in corporate governance. Ultimately, the fund manager illustrated a consistent framework through which they balance business considerations with governance considerations, noting the strength of the company in managing short term risk, operational efficiency, and product safety. The fund manager also agreed to closely monitor this specific governance incident and provide updates to Glenmede on a future quarterly call.