This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

PGIM Fixed Income

PRI reporting framework 2020

You are in Direct - Fixed Income » ESG incorporation in actively managed fixed income

アクティブ運用している債券におけるESGの組み入れ

実施プロセス

FI 01. Incorporation strategies applied

以下を記載してください。 (1)組織でアクティブ運用する債券投資について、どのESG組み入れ戦略や組み合わせを使用しているか(2)各戦略が適用されるアクティブ運用債券投資合計の割合(+/- 5%)
SSA
0 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
100 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
社債(金融)
0 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
100 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
社債(非金融)
0 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
100 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
証券化商品
0 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
100 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%

01.2. 特定のESG組み入れ戦略を選択している理由と、使用する戦略の組み合わせを説明してください。

PGIM Fixed Income's goal is to consider relevant ESG factors in our investment process as we work towards achieving our ultimate fiduciary duty; searching for the highest risk adjusted returns for our clients. Within this context, we seek to demonstrate a solid corporate governance framework in our investment process as we aim to protect our clients' assets for the long-term.

ESG factor integration is primarily applied within the bottom-up part of the investment process when assessing the impact on individual securities under consideration. Our research analysts are experts in their respective industries and asset classes, and we believe they are best positioned to identify ESG issues and determine their materiality.

01.3. 補足情報 [任意]

Regarding the proportion of actively managed fixed income investments by strategy in response to question FI 01.1, we assess ESG risks and opportunities as an integral part of our credit research process and bottom-up investment process.  In addition, we apply ESG screens in certain separately-managed mandates, based on client requirements, as agreed to in investment management agreements.

Currently, we anticipate launching three ESG funds whose guidelines will incorporate internal ESG ratings to develop an ESG-friendly product by screening issuers below a certain rating threshold.  

 


FI 02. ESG issues and issuer research (Private)


FI 03. Processes to ensure analysis is robust

03.1. 組織のESG調査プロセスの堅牢性を確保する方法を記載してください。

03.2. ESG情報または分析を投資チーム内で共有する方法を記載してください。

          Our ESG Committee meets to discuss any updates or changes to our approach.
        

03.3. 補足情報 [任意]

The PGIM Fixed Income ESG Committee has been established to act as the governing body for directing and overseeing PGIM Fixed Income’s ESG-related activities, with specific responsibility for:

·          Developing all policies and procedures that integrate ESG factors into the PGIM Fixed Income investment process, both generally and with respect to specific PGIM Fixed Income products

·          Establishing the methodology for PGIM Fixed Income’s internal ESG rating framework

·          Overseeing the assignment of all ESG ratings

·          Monitoring ESG-related engagement with individual issuers; and

·          Establishing and maintaining guidelines for ESG-related funds managed by PGIM Fixed Income.


Our commitment to Responsible Investment at board level can be seen in the makeup of our ESG Committee which consists of senior executives and investment professionals. The committee is co-chaired by our CIO / Head of Fixed Income and Head of Global Investment Grade Credit Research. The Voting Members of the Committee include the Head of Credit, Chief Economist, and senior credit analysts from our Investment Grade, Emerging Markets, Leveraged Finance, Municipal, and Securitised Credit desks with representation from our Newark, London and Tokyo offices.


A) 実施:スクリーニング

FI 04. Types of screening applied

04.1. 実施するスクリーニングの種類を記載してください。

当てはまる項目を全てを選択してください
SSA
社債(金融)
社債(非金融)
証券化商品
ネガティブ/ 排他的スクリーニング
ポジティブ/業界最高のスクリーニング
基準に基づくスクリーニング

04.2. 組織内でアクティブ運用している債券に適用するスクリーニングのアプローチを記載してください。

Given the regional diversity and sensitivities of PGIM Fixed Income global client base, many of our clients are keen for us to select credits across as broad a universe of investment opportunities as is appropriate for the strategy. We have adopted an approach and allow the use of SRI screens in each separately managed mandate based on client requirements in the investment management agreement.

04.3. 補足情報 [任意]

In 2018, PGIM Fixed Income approved expanding the use of socially-responsible screening in the management of all of our UCITS funds. We have engaged a third-party agent, Sustainalytics, to screen for the ineligible SRI investments, and the list is updated every month.

Norm-based screening is also used in some of our pooled funds to filter companies that violate the United Nations Global Compact. An exclusion strategy is also applied to identify companies that are involved in certain prohibited industries (e.g. the manufacture of tobacco, or the production of nuclear or other controversial weapons including anti-personnel mines, cluster weapons, biological/chemical weapons, depleted uranium, nuclear weapons, and white phosphorus.)

 


FI 05. Examples of ESG factors in screening process (Private)


FI 06. Screening - ensuring criteria are met

06.1. 債券投資においてファンドスクリーニングの基準に違反がないことを確認するために組織が使用しているシステムを記載してください。

スクリーニングの種類
ネガティブ/排他的スクリーニング​
基準に基づくスクリーニング​

06.2. 補足情報 [任意]


C) 実施:ESG問題の統合

FI 10. Integration overview

10.1. ESGを従来の財務分析に統合するアプローチを説明してください。

As part of the credit research process, PGIM Fixed Income analysts review publicly-available ESG concerns as well as those expressed by a third party provider (Sustainalytics). When we deem appropriate, analysts engage with senior management of the issuer, requesting that they comment on any material ESG issues. It is important to note that unlike equity investors, fixed income investors do not benefit from having voting rights and therefore have limited leverage on management in that they do not have the ability to vote on issues including the selection of key management and pay issues.

The ESG concerns, as well as management's response to the comments (when applicable), are noted in our internal credit reports, which are made available to portfolio managers. These comments often influence portfolio managers decision making.

We have a five-step process which integrates ESG factors into our fundamental opinions:

1. Identifying material ESG issues that may have an impact on an issuer on an issuer and documenting those items into our internal research database, Aladdin® Research. This enables our analysts to monitor these issues over time and provide updates to the companies’ progress in addressing them.

2. Our analysts will engage with issuers when we believe the potential ESG items highlighted are material. The objective here is to get a better understanding of how management will address these issues. Our opinion of management’s credibility on ESG issues helps to inform our fundamental credit opinion.

3. Our analysts will document all material ESG issuers in a specific section within our in-depth credit research reports. Here, the analyst highlights the issues and explains how the issues are considered with respect to their fundamental credit opinions.

4. Our newest step is the pending launch of our internal proprietary ESG ratings. After considering potential ESG issues and our engagement with management, our analysts will be assigning an internal ESG ratings. We expect to launch these internal ratings later in 2020.

5. Our final step integrates the analysts and the portfolio managers. The portfolio managers maintain ESG relative value journals which capture all discussions between portfolio managers and analysts regarding ESG issues and our relative value opinion on those issues.

The senior portfolio managers then construct the portfolio along with the team of sector specialists and analysts. The portfolio management team reviews the research before deciding whether or not the issuer has any material ESG concerns. The portfolio managers also ensure that the issuer would not violate any guidelines of the portfolio (including any SRI screens or restrictions).

10.2. 投資する債券の各種類に対してESG統合アプローチをどのように調整するのか説明してください。

SSA

An important focus of PGIM Fixed Income’s sovereign research is on macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability. ESG issues feature prominently in this analysis and, in particular, the sovereign ratings process. In addition to a fundamental macroeconomic score that captures pertinent macroeconomic strengths and vulnerabilities, PGIM Fixed Income's sovereign ratings framework is also based upon a comprehensive assessment of qualitative aspects that guide policy making. These aspects include institutional strengths and weaknesses, potential governance issues, as well as social issues that could affect relevant macroeconomic variables.

We believe that any framework to assess ESG-related qualities needs to balance the objective of providing a comprehensive and consistent assessment with the challenges of data availability and reliability. Such constraints can quickly become binding when attempting to measure intangible variables, such as good governance or tolerance and social inclusiveness. At the same time, proper variable selection is critical to ensure that the rank sufficiently captures meaningful differences in ESG performance.

These considerations call for a systematic approach. PGIM Fixed Income has developed a proprietary index that provides an ESG-based ranking of countries, referred to as PGIM Fixed Income’s ESG Rank. The index methodology closely follows the approach underlying the construction of PGIM Fixed Income’s Fundamental Macro Rank (FMR). This rank compares macroeconomic strengths and vulnerabilities across different cohorts of countries.

For governance issues, we utilise the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) which are widely recognised as a primary data source for governance issues. The World Bank collects these indices in collaboration with the Brookings Institution and the Natural Resource Governance Institute. Based on a large number of underlying variables, these indices provide country rankings for size categories, namely (i) voice and accountability; (ii) political stability and absence of violence; (iii) government effectiveness; (iv) regulatory quality; (v) rule of law; and (vi) control of corruption. Equally weighting these six sub-indices, we construct a headline index in order to arrive at country rank for governance issues.

 

社債(金融)

At PGIM Fixed Income our analysts perform in-depth bottom up fundamental research with a view towards long term sustainability. The Principles of the UN Global Compact and the UN Sustainable Development Goals are a part of the lens through which we analyse all issuers and industries. We measure all our companies (especially those who operate with higher carbon footprints) in terms of their long run business plans and we try to determine if those plans are credible and achievable. We measure their progress against their plans to determine if management is reliable. When we think about long run sustainability, we take into consideration the carbon footprint and whether or not a company’s plans will ensure that they are a viable enterprise for the long run.

As part of the credit research process, PGIM Fixed Income analysts review publicly-available ESG concerns as well as those expressed by a third party provider (Sustainalytics). When we deem appropriate, analysts may engage with senior management of the issuer, requesting that they comment on any material ESG issues. The ESG concerns, as well as management's response to the comments (when applicable), are noted in our internal credit reports, which are made available to portfolio managers.

Governance is the most important ESG factor we consider for financials.  Business ethics and corruption, bribery, fraud, accounting standards, and board: Independence, Diversity, Transparency, Experience, Leadership are all important ESG factors that we consider most material within the financial industry.

社債(非金融)

At PGIM Fixed Income our analysts perform in-depth bottom up fundamental research with a view towards long term sustainability. The Principles of the UN Global Compact and the UN Sustainable Development Goals are a part of the lens through which we analyse all issuers and industries. We measure all our companies (especially those who operate with higher carbon footprints) in terms of their long run business plans and we try to determine if those plans are credible and achievable. We measure their progress against their plans to determine if management is reliable. When we think about long run sustainability, we take into consideration the carbon footprint and whether or not a company’s plans will ensure that they are a viable enterprise for the long run.

As part of the credit research process, PGIM Fixed Income analysts review publicly-available ESG concerns as well as those expressed by a third party provider (Sustainalytics). When we deem appropriate, analysts may engage with senior management of the issuer, requesting that they comment on any material ESG issues.

Climate risks and opportunities are one of the topics we address during engagements. For example, engagement on climate related issues is often discussed within our electric utilities and energy sectors.  Our utilities analysts monitor carbon emissions, fuel mix, power generation, carbon targets, renewable targets among other metrics disclosed by the companies as well as third party research from MSCI or Sustainalytics.  To the extent they have questions or need updates they engage with the issuers directly. 

The ESG concerns, as well as management's response to the comments (when applicable), are noted in our internal credit reports, which are made available to portfolio managers.

証券化商品

In securitised products we have been assigning securities internal ESG ratings for some time, but recently have evolved the ESG ratings framework to align to a firmwide methodology which has just been finalised.  The issues that inform the ESG ratings vary in consideration and can be sector specific.

Environmental considerations range from sponsors’ compliance with environmental regulation to broad sustainability issues. We were a lead investor in Fannie Mae’s first Green REMIC multifamily transaction, the proceeds of which were used to encourage apartment building owners to make energy and water-savings improvements; the outcome should be better quality housing with a lower environmental impact and positive cash flows.

Social considerations include lenders' origination and underwriting processes and servicing operations.  Analysts assess potential regulatory and reputational risks associated with predatory lending laws, disparate impact rulings, and known Consumer Financial Protection Bureau points of emphasis.

Regarding governance, analysts meet with management, audit, legal, and compliance departments to understand oversight of credit underwriting, origination, and servicing practices. Rigorous transaction documentation review helps mitigate shortfalls in the governance of the securitisations themselves.  Examples include identifying conflicts of interest between insiders (Trustees, Servicers, Rep and Warranty providers), identifying intercreditor issues (e.g. senior debt holder’s protection against junior class encroachment), assessing the document’s amendment process and transaction events of default, and ensuring dispute resolution mechanisms are documented and functional.

10.3. 補足情報 [任意]


 


FI 11. Integration - ESG information in investment processes

11.1. ESG情報が、通常、投資プロセスの一部としてどのように使用されるのか記載してください。

当てはまるものをすべて選択してください
SSA
社債(金融)
社債(非金融)
証券化商品​
ESG分析をファンダメンタル分析に組み込んでいる
ESG分析が発行体の内部信用評価を調整するために利用される
ESG分析が予想財務業績および将来キャッシュフロー予測を調整するために利用される
ESG分析が発行体の同業グループと比較したランキングに影響する
発行体のESG債スプレッドおよび同セクター企業に対するその相対価値が、すべてのリスクが織り込まれているか否かを把握するために分析される
各種デュレーション/満期の発行体債券へのESG分析の影響が分析される。
感度分析およびシナリオ分析が、ベースケースとESG組み込み証券評価の差を比較する評価モデルに適用される
ESG分析が、ポートフォリオのウェイティング決定に組み込まれている
会社、セクター、国、通貨が、ESGエクスポージャーの変化およびリスク制限の違反についてモニタリングされる
ESGリスクが大きい証券についてポートフォリオのESGプロファイルが検討され、ベンチマークのESGプロファイルと比較して評価される
その他(具体的に記載してください)

11.2. 補足情報 [任意]


FI 12. Integration - E,S and G issues reviewed

12.1. 組織の統合プロセスでESG問題をどのように検討するか示してください。

E(環境)
S(社会)
G(ガバナンス)
SSA

E(環境)

S(社会)

G(ガバナンス)

社債(金融)

E(環境)

S(社会)

G(ガバナンス)

社債(非金融)

E(環境)

S(社会)

G(ガバナンス)

証券化商品

E(環境)

S(社会)

G(ガバナンス)

12.2. 組織の統合プロセスでE/S/G要因を検討する方法を詳しく説明してください。

SSA

An important focus of PGIM Fixed Income’s sovereign research is on macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability. ESG issues feature prominently in this analysis and, in particular, the sovereign ratings process. In addition to a fundamental macroeconomic score that captures pertinent macroeconomic strengths and vulnerabilities, PGIM Fixed Income's sovereign ratings framework is also based upon a comprehensive assessment of qualitative aspects that guide policy making. These aspects include institutional strengths and weaknesses, potential governance issues, as well as social issues that could affect relevant macroeconomic variables.

We believe that any framework to assess ESG-related qualities needs to balance the objective of providing a comprehensive and consistent assessment with the challenges of data availability and reliability. Such constraints can quickly become binding when attempting to measure intangible variables, such as good governance or tolerance and social inclusiveness. At the same time, proper variable selection is critical to ensure that the rank sufficiently captures meaningful differences in ESG performance.

These considerations call for a systematic approach. PGIM Fixed Income has developed a proprietary index that provides an ESG-based ranking of countries, referred to as PGIM Fixed Income’s ESG Rank. The index methodology closely follows the approach underlying the construction of PGIM Fixed Income’s Fundamental Macro Rank (FMR). This rank compares macroeconomic strengths and vulnerabilities across different cohorts of countries

For governance issues, we utilise the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) which are widely recognised as a primary data source for governance issues. The World Bank collects these indices in collaboration with the Brookings Institution and the Natural Resource Governance Institute. Based on a large number of underlying variables, these indices provide country rankings for size categories, namely (i) voice and accountability; (ii) political stability and absence of violence; (iii) government effectiveness; (iv) regulatory quality; (v) rule of law; and (vi) control of corruption. Equally weighting these six sub-indices, we construct a headline index in order to arrive at country rank for governance issues.

社債(金融)

Our investment process begins with the senior investment team assessing the global market environment. This includes the review of any ESG issues by our credit research analysts or global economists. The majority of our ESG analysis would be conducted at this stage. While we conduct our own ESG research, our credit research team and economists also utilise third-party ESG research.

With respect to corporate credit research, we have a five-step process which integrates ESG factors into our fundamental opinions.

1. Identifying material ESG issues that may have an impact on an issuer on an issuer and documenting those items into our internal research database, Aladdin® Research. This enables our analysts to monitor these issues over time and provide updates to the companies’ progress in addressing them.

2. Our analysts will engage with issuers when we believe the potential ESG items highlighted are material. The objective here is to get a better understanding of how management will address these issues. Our opinion of management’s credibility on ESG issues helps to inform our fundamental credit opinion.

3. Our analysts will document all material ESG issuers in a specific section within our in-depth credit research reports. Here, the analyst highlights the issues and explains how the issues are considered with respect to their fundamental credit opinions.

4. Our newest step is the pending launch of our internal proprietary ESG ratings. After considering potential ESG issues and our engagement with management, our analysts will be assigning an internal ESG ratings. We expect to launch these internal ratings later in 2020.

5. Our final step integrates the analysts and the portfolio managers. The portfolio managers maintain ESG relative value journals which capture all discussions between portfolio managers and analysts regarding ESG issues and our relative value opinion on those issues.

The senior portfolio managers then construct the portfolio along with the team of sector specialists and analysts. The portfolio management team reviews the research before deciding whether or not the issuer has any material ESG concerns. The portfolio managers also ensure that the issuer would not violate any guidelines of the portfolio (including any SRI screens or restrictions).

Portfolio managers and risk managers oversee risk positioning daily, which includes the review of any material ESG issues that would either cause the portfolio to exceed its risk budget or result in a violation of ESG restrictions.

Main Corporate (Financial) ESG Broad Factors for Consideration

Governance

•               Board: Independence, Diversity, Transparency, Experience, Leadership

•               Global Compact Signatory

•               ESG Reporting: Disclosure, Performance Targets

•               Financial Reporting: Disclosure, Timeliness, Transparency

•               Incidents: Business Ethics, Governance, Accounting, Tax, Bribery, etc.

社債(非金融)

Our investment process begins with the senior investment team assessing the global market environment. This includes the review of any ESG issues by our credit research analysts or global economists. The majority of our ESG analysis would be conducted at this stage. While we conduct our own ESG research, our credit research team and economists also utilise third-party ESG research models.

With respect to corporate credit research, we have a five-step process which integrates ESG factors into our fundamental opinions.

1. Identifying material ESG issues that may have an impact on an issuer on an issuer and documenting those items into our internal research database, Aladdin® Research. This enables our analysts to monitor these issues over time and provide updates to the companies’ progress in addressing them.

2. Our analysts will engage with issuers when we believe the potential ESG items highlighted are material. The objective here is to get a better understanding of how management will address these issues. Our opinion of management’s credibility on ESG issues helps to inform our fundamental credit opinion.

3. Our analysts will document all material ESG issuers in a specific section within our in-depth credit research reports. Here, the analyst highlights the issues and explains how the issues are considered with respect to their fundamental credit opinions.

4. Our newest step is the pending launch of our internal proprietary ESG ratings. After considering potential ESG issues and our engagement with management, our analysts will be assigning an internal ESG ratings. We expect to launch these internal ratings later in 2020.

5. Our final step integrates the analysts and the portfolio managers. The portfolio managers maintain ESG relative value journals which capture all discussions between portfolio managers and analysts regarding ESG issues and our relative value opinion on those issues.

The senior portfolio managers then construct the portfolio along with the team of sector specialists and analysts. The portfolio management team reviews the research before deciding whether or not the issuer has any material ESG concerns. The portfolio managers also ensure that the issuer would not violate any guidelines of the portfolio (including any SRI screens or restrictions).

Portfolio managers and risk managers oversee risk positioning daily, which includes the review of any material ESG issues that would either cause the portfolio to exceed its risk budget or result in a violation of ESG restrictions.

ESG Broad Factors for Consideration

Environmental

•               Overall Environmental Policies

•               Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Program, Reporting & Trend

•               Water and Wastewater Management Programs

•               Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Programs

•               Waste & Hazardous Materials Program

•               Environmental Fines & Penalties

Social

•               Human Rights Policies

•               Working Conditions & Employee Incidents

•               Supply Chain Monitoring

•               Diversity and Inclusion Programmes

•               Data Security & Privacy Breaches

•               Product Safety and Consumer Protections

Governance

•               Board: Independence, Diversity, Transparency, Experience, Leadership

•               Global Compact Signatory

•               ESG Reporting: Disclosure, Performance Targets

•               Financial Reporting: Disclosure, Timeliness, Transparency

•               Incidents: Business Ethics, Governance, Accounting, Tax, Bribery, etc.

証券化商品

In securitised credit, the issues that inform the ESG ratings vary in consideration and can be asset class specific.

Environmental considerations range from Sponsor’s compliance with environmental regulation to broad sustainability issues. We were a lead investor in Fannie Mae’s first Green REMIC multifamily transaction, the proceeds of which were used to encourage apartment building owners to make energy and water-savings improvements; the outcome should be better quality housing with a lower environmental impact and positive cash flows.

Social considerations include lenders' origination and underwriting processes and servicing operations.  Analysts assess if the issuer’s operational practices increases the lender’s exposure to regulatory and/or reputational risks associated with predatory lending laws, disparate impact rulings, and known Consumer Financial Protection Bureau points of emphasis.

Regarding governance, analysts meet with management, audit, legal, and compliance departments to understand oversight of credit underwriting, origination, and servicing practices. Rigorous transaction documentation review helps mitigate shortfalls in the governance of the securitisations themselves.  Examples include identifying conflicts of interest between insiders (Trustees, Servicers, Rep and Warranty providers), identifying intercreditor issues (e.g. senior debt holder’s protection against junior class encroachment), assessing the document’s amendment process and transaction events of default, and ensuring dispute resolution mechanisms are documented and functional.

External Resources

PGIM Fixed Income maintains a partnership with an external vendor, Sustainalytics, a “global leader in ESG & Corporate Governance Research & Ratings” to enhance its ESG review process.

12.3. 補足情報 [任意]


Top