This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn

PRI reporting framework 2020

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Fixed Income » ESG incorporation in actively managed fixed income » (C) Implementation: Integration

(C) Implementation: Integration

FI 10. Integration overview

10.1. Describe your approach to integrating ESG into traditional financial analysis.

Our asset manager PGGM has a dedicated section on ESG factors in its research write-up on each individual issuer, where they try to establish a picture on the overall performance of the company compared to relevant peers in the sector in terms of sector-specific ESG metrics, while paying specific attention to ESG risks which could pose a material impact to the performance of the company going forward. These factors together result in an overall score for the company in terms of ESG and this has a material impact on the overall credit score of a company.

10.2. Describe how your ESG integration approach is adapted to each of the different types of fixed income you invest in.

SSA

ESG analysis

The allocation to the different debt issuers, governments and SSA s, in our investment mandates is determined both through a top-down and bottom-up analysis. We analyse financial markets and the macro-economic environment to develop an understanding where credit spreads or the yield curve is heading. Next to this PGGM Rates thoroughly analyses biannually the fundamental credit drivers of every debt issuer it invests in. This analysis focuses not only on economic developments and structural reforms but also on environmental, social and governance factors.

Sovereign issuers in developed markets tend to exhibit comparatively high ESG scores as well as GDP per capita. The level of indebtedness of developed sovereigns also tends to be higher than for emerging markets. A heavy debt burden can act as a drag on growth. ESG factors have the power to unlock structural reforms which in turn can act as a catalyst for growth.

In line with our beliefs, Capelle-Blancard et al. (2016) show that countries with good ESG performance tend to have less default risk and thus lower bond spreads. Moreover, the economic impact is stronger in the long run, suggesting that ESG performance is a long-lasting phenomenon. Social, but primarily governance factors have a financial impact on government bonds according to their research, and this effect happens to be the largest in the Eurozone.

We rely, next to our own understanding, on research by MSCI ESG and Sustainalytics when analysing the ESG factors influencing debt issuers. Also the traditional credit rating agencies (Moody's, S&P) are focusing increasingly on ESG factors in their credit analysis. Research by the European Commission, the IMF and the World Economic Forum are also of particular help in our bottom-up analysis.

Engagement

Sovereigns are the key stakeholders to channel economies towards sustainable development pathways. They negotiate international treaties (peace, labour, trade, environment). They set national laws and fiscal framework. As an important institutional investor with large interest rate mandates, we are in frequent contact with the debt issuing departments (DMOs) of both governments and SSAs. In these conversations we stress the importance for our clients of the social returns that are expected next to the financial aspects of our investments. By stressing that ESG is taken into account when evaluating issuers, we incentivize the issuer to improve on these metrics. As a PRI signatory we have stated that we will engage with government officials. Finally, PGGM Rates is pushing issuers for emitting green bonds. Green bond road shows and investments provide an opportunity for us as an investor to engage on environmental concerns and align issuer activities with our values.

Counterparty policy

Of all transaction costs that we bear, the biggest chunk comes from trading in interest rate products. Bond and swap transactions form a significant part of these costs. These transactions are predominantly not done on an exchange but in a bilateral relationship. Integrating ESG in PGGM's counterparty policy is thus a logical consequence. For the interest rate portfolios, the responsibility for counterparty policy is delegated to PGGM's Trading department.

Counterparties are yearly ranked on an ESG scale by the various relevant departments within PGGM . The objective of this sustainability 'ladder' is to be in constant dialogue with our counterparties on their respective ESG policy. Through dialogue and engagement activities with our financial counterparties PGGM is working towards a more stable and sustainable financial system.

Corporate (financial)

We have a dedicated section on ESG factors in our research write-up on each individual issuer, where we try to establish a picture on the overall performance of the company compared to relevant peers in the sector in terms of sector-specific ESG metrics, while paying specific attention to ESG risks which could pose a material impact to the performance of the company going forward. These factors together result in an overall score for the company in terms of ESG and this has a material impact on the overall credit score of a company.

Corporate (non-financial)

We have a dedicated section on ESG factors in our research write-up on each individual issuer, where we try to establish a picture on the overall performance of the company compared to relevant peers in the sector in terms of sector-specific ESG metrics, while paying specific attention to ESG risks which could pose a material impact to the performance of the company going forward. These factors together result in an overall score for the company in terms of ESG and this has a material impact on the overall credit score of a company.

Securitised

ESG factors are integrated in the due diligence PGGM performs in any CRS transaction. We also engage with our risk sharing partners to further develop their ESG policies and practices. In addition, we actively approach banks on opportunities for risk sharing in loan portfolios which focus on companies that provide a positive contribution to climate-related topics: Investing in solutions (impact investing / thematic investments).

We aim to participate in the core business of the bank and build a long-term relationship. This enables us to get to know the loan origination and risk management process of the bank increasingly well. This is achieved through our thorough due diligence process and also via the monitoring of our individual transactions. This feedback loop provides an opportunity for continued dialogue on the choices made, directly with the people driving these processes within the banks. The CILI team's focus regarding responsible investing for CRS transactions can be divided into two main themes. Firstly, we believe these risk sharing transactions can contribute to a more stable financial system and add value to the real economy. By entering into a credit risk sharing transaction, the bank will free up capital which can be redeployed and will enlarge the bank's capacity to lend. In addition, we consciously take up our role as one of the largest investors in this asset class in promoting and contributing to financial system stability. We do this by exchanging views with market participants and regulators on how CRS transactions can be structured in a sustainable way to ensure genuine risk sharing that indeed contributes to a stable financial system. When selecting the banks to partner with and the loan portfolios in which we share the risk, ESG factors are an integral part of the analysis and decision process. ESG factors represent a wide range of aspects which can have an effect - directly or indirectly - on the borrower's ability to service its debt obligations in the future. We strongly believe that banks taking these factors into account are better equipped to assess credit risk of their corporate clients.

During the initial phase of a potential CRS investment the CILI team assesses whether there are specific ESG topics to consider with regards to the envisaged risk sharing bank, as well as the industry sectors and countries in the envisaged portfolio of loans for the risk sharing transaction. Next to our own understanding, we utilise country, sector and bank-specific research from dedicated research firms like MSCI and Sustainalytics, to give guidance regarding which topics the due diligence should focus on. These reports serve to provide examples of where controversies have arisen in the past, in relation to the banks´ lending activities in the relevant countries or industries. Those topics will be discussed during the due diligence interviews. The bank's overall ESG rating, together with the ranking of the bank on the PGGM Sustainability Ranking list, is relevant for determining a more general view on whether the bank fits PGGM's profile of a valued long-term risk sharing partner. The list scores PGGM's financial counterparties on how they contribute to a stable and sustainable financial system, and has the objective to maintain the dialogue on their respective ESG policies.

In light of the due diligence performed, it is relevant to note that the loans in which we share the credit risk remain part of the banks' balance sheet and risk management processes. The risk sharing is realised by means of a bilateral contract with the bank, based on which the bank will receive compensation in case a loan is not repaid. This means it is instrumental to develop a thorough understanding and assess the quality of the loan origination and monitoring process of the bank we partner with. The way in which the bank takes into account ESG factors is an integral part of that assessment. During our assessment of the banks origination strategy and quality of the risk management process, we investigate which ESG policies the bank has implemented, how it ensures these are being adhered to and impact the bank's decisions, and to what extent the convictions behind these policies are part of the bank's culture

We investigate whether the bank has defined policies, relevant to its regions and client base. For instance, on sectors where pollution and impact on the environment play a role we seek for the bank to set clear guidelines on what activities it will not finance or require approval at higher level of seniority and input from sustainability risk managers. Examples of such sectors are mining, oil & gas, forestry and palm oil. In the case of project finance, we verify if and when the bank has signed up to the Equator Principles. If the policies are not publicly shared, we request to receive the policies as part of our due diligence, in order to see the scope and depth of the framework. We look into the bank's approach and course of action in case of sensitive sectors or ESG related topics. In some cases, banks will pursue engagement instead of exclusion, by setting clear goals as part of the financing facility they provide, in that way motivating the company towards the desired change of behaviour. As part of our due diligence we establish how the ESG lending policies are governed. Who provides input and has authority to make decisions with respect to the policies followed and the lending decisions. Besides verifying that appropriate policies are applied, we also verify to what extent the bank's employees, who the CRS deal team meets during the various due diligence conversations, demonstrate a true knowledge of these policies and how they form part of the bank's credit approval process. The CRS deal team reviews actual loan proposals to see how the assessment of ESG risks takes place in practice. We assess which decision-making bodies are involved when potential ESG arise, who is responsible for flagging, and whether there is sufficient countervailing power between risk management and the business.

10.3. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

During the meeting with representatives from client relationship management as well as risk management, we will ask to illustrate with examples of where the bank has had elaborate internal discussions, taken action or in the end decided to not pursue or exit an existing relationship. We ask whether the bank has specific internal targets related to ESG standards or risks. The meetings with representatives from the bank's relationship management and risk management teams help us to determine the culture within the bank, i.e. to what extent the policies that apply are indeed embraced by the wider group of individuals that are the day-to-day guardians of it. Part of this is to investigate how employees are made aware on the bank's targets in this respect.

The CRS team engages with the risk sharing bank via different angles. During the above-described due diligence process we put emphasis on the value of ESG analysis done by the bank. This has a challenging and hopefully thought-provoking effect. On an anonymous basis we inform banks on the performance of peers that demonstrate best-in-class behaviour in this field. By stressing that ESG is important to us when evaluating bank loan exposure, we incentivize the bank to improve on how they take into account ESG risk. For instance, over the last few years we have challenged banks on how they incorporate ESG risks within their risk process and suggested to apply specific ESG ratings to their clients. We are seeing a positive momentum in respect of separate ESG ratings determined by the bank for individual companies they lend to. A handful of banks has started to use an ESG rating, while various others are working on establishing an appropriate framework. We highly stimulate this development and think it is relevant to capture this more indirect credit risk. Furthermore, the CRS team is actively approaching banks on opportunities for risk sharing in loan portfolios which focus on companies that provide a positive contribution to climate-related topics: Investing in solutions. We stimulate CRS transactions where the loan portfolio includes financing to companies or projects that specifically contribute to the area of climate, healthcare, food security and water.

 


FI 11. Integration - ESG information in investment processes

11.1. Indicate how ESG information is typically used as part of your investment process.

Select all that apply
SSA
Corporate (financial)
Corporate (non-financial)
Securitised
ESG analysis is integrated into fundamental analysis
ESG analysis is used to adjust the internal credit assessments of issuers.
ESG analysis is used to adjust forecasted financials and future cash flow estimates.
ESG analysis impacts the ranking of an issuer relative to a chosen peer group.
An issuer`s ESG bond spreads and its relative value versus its sector peers are analysed to find out if all risks are priced in.
The impact of ESG analysis on bonds of an issuer with different durations/maturities are analysed.
Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis are applied to valuation models to compare the difference between base-case and ESG-integrated security valuation.
ESG analysis is integrated into portfolio weighting decisions.
Companies, sectors, countries and currency and monitored for changes in ESG exposure and for breaches of risk limits.
The ESG profile of portfolios is examined for securities with high ESG risks and assessed relative to the ESG profile of a benchmark.
Other, specify in Additional Information

11.2. Additional information [OPTIONAL]

See F10 for further information on how applied in Securitised.

 


FI 12. Integration - E,S and G issues reviewed

12.1. Indicate the extent to which ESG issues are reviewed in your integration process.

Environment
Social
Governance
SSA

Environmental

Social

Governance

Corporate (financial)

Environmental

Social

Governance

Corporate (non-financial)

Environmental

Social

Governance

Securitised

Environmental

Social

Governance

12.2. Please provide more detail on how you review E, S and/or G factors in your integration process.

SSA

We analyse the scores and the trends of the ESG scores from MSCI ESG and Sustainalytics. Next to this we look at the incidents and incident handling reported. We take these findings into account when we meet with the issuer.

For each sector, relevant metrics in terms of E, S and G are identified and discussed in the extensive write-up on each company. Furthermore, if there are any material ESG risks that have been identified for the company, the potential impact and likelihood of the risk are also discussed, which all results in a dedicated ESG score for the company, which is then taken into account when determining the overall credit score for the company. If the ESG score is too low, we refrain from investing in the company anyway

Corporate (financial)

For each sector, relevant metrics in terms of E, S and G are identified and discussed in the extensive write-up on each company. Furthermore, if there are any material ESG risks that have been identified for the company, the potential impact and likelihood of the risk are also discussed, which all results in a dedicated ESG score for the company, which is then taken into account when determining the overall credit score for the company. If the ESG score is too low, we refrain from investing in the company anyway.

Corporate (non-financial)

For each sector, relevant metrics in terms of E, S and G are identified and discussed in the extensive write-up on each company. Furthermore, if there are any material ESG risks that have been identified for the company, the potential impact and likelihood of the risk are also discussed, which all results in a dedicated ESG score for the company, which is then taken into account when determining the overall credit score for the company. If the ESG score is too low, we refrain from investing in the company anyway.

Securitised

During the initial phase of a potential CRS investment the CILI team assesses whether there are specific ESGtopics to consider with regards to the envisaged risk sharing bank, as well as the industry sectors and countries in the envisaged portfolio of loans for the risk sharing transaction. Next to our own understanding, we utilise country, sector and bank-specific research from dedicated research firms like MSCI and Sustainalytics, to give guidance regarding which topics the due diligence should focus on. These reports serve to provide examples of where controversies have arisen in the past, in relation to the banks´ lending activities in the relevant countries or industries. Those topics will be discussed during the due diligence interviews. The bank's overall ESG rating, together with the ranking of the bank on the PGGM Sustainability Ranking list, is relevant for determining a more general view on whether the bank fits PGGM's profile of a valued longterm risk sharing partner. The list scores PGGM's financial counterparties on how they contribute to a stable and sustainable financial system, and has the objective to maintain the dialogue on their respective ESG policies. During our assessment of the banks origination strategy and quality of the risk management process, we investigate which ESG policies the bank has implemented, how it ensures these are being adhered to and impact the bank's decisions, and to what extent the convictions behind these policies are part of the bank's culture. We investigate whether the bank has defined policies, relevant to its regions and client base. For instance, on sectors where pollution and impact on the environment play a role we seek for the bank to set clear guidelines on what activities it will not finance or require approval at higher level of seniority and input from sustainability risk managers. Examples of such sectors are mining, oil & gas, forestry and palm oil. In the case of project finance, we verify if and when the bank has signed up to the Equator Principles. If the policies are not publicly shared, we request to receive the policies as part of our due diligence, in order to see the scope and depth of the framework. We look into the bank's approach and course of action in case of sensitive sectors or ESG related topics. In some cases, banks will pursue engagement instead of exclusion, by setting clear goals as part of the financing facility they provide, in that way motivating the company towards the desired change of behaviour.

 

12.3. Additional information.[OPTIONAL]

For more detailed information please also see our Fixed income RI guideline and our CRS guideline:

https://www.pggm.nl/wat-doen-we/Documents/emc-guidelines_february-2015_pggm.pdf

 https://www.pggm.nl/english/what-we-do/Documents/PGGM-Responsible-Investment-Guidelines-for-Rates.pdf

https://www.pggm.nl/wat-doen-we/Documents/pggm-responsible-investment-in-grade-credits.pdf

 https://www.pggm.nl/wat-doen-we/Documents/PGGM-Responsible-investing-guidelines-for-CRS%20_2019.pdf


Top