This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Vontobel Holding AG

PRI reporting framework 2019

You are in Direct - Fixed Income » ESG incorporation in actively managed fixed income

アクティブ運用している債券におけるESGの組み入れ

実施プロセス

FI 01. Incorporation strategies applied

以下を記載してください。 (1)組織でアクティブ運用する債券投資について、どのESG組み入れ戦略や組み合わせを使用しているか(2)各戦略が適用されるアクティブ運用債券投資合計の割合(+/- 5%)
SSA
100 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
0 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
社債(金融)
100 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
0 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
社債(非金融)
100 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
0 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%
証券化商品
100 スクリーニングのみ
0 テーマのみ
0 統合のみ
0 スクリーニング + 統合戦略
0 テーマ + 統合戦略
0 スクリーニング + テーマ戦略
0 3つの戦略すべての組み合わせ
0 組み入れ戦略を適用していない
100%

01.2. 特定のESG組み入れ戦略を選択している理由と、使用する戦略の組み合わせを説明してください。

At Vontobel, we are convinced that a one-size-fits-all ESG approach falls short to account for differences in geographies, asset classes as well as investment styles and objectives. For this reason, we develop specialized ESG strategies tailored to the respective investment strategy. This enables us to cover a wide range of client needs in a targeted manner, thus creating added value compared to standardized ESG approaches, such as passive ESG ETFs.

In the management of bond strategies, performance is mainly driven by aspects such as duration, currency and ratings. Bonds are often purchased out of new issuance in order to keep costs low. We consider it therefore more practicable to mainly use stable sustainable investment universes for our sustainable bond products instead of broad integration processes. As a consequence, our sustainability funds and mandates are based upon a screening approach. For more mainstream investment products, in our view, the screening approach is most convincing, too. It is by applying this approach, that we can establish a clearly structured investment process.

01.3. 補足情報 [任意]


FI 02. ESG issues and issuer research (Private)


FI 03. Processes to ensure analysis is robust

03.1. 組織のESG調査プロセスの堅牢性を確保する方法を記載してください。

03.2. ESG情報または分析を投資チーム内で共有する方法を記載してください。

03.3. 補足情報 [任意]


A) 実施:スクリーニング

FI 04. Types of screening applied

04.1. 実施するスクリーニングの種類を記載してください。

当てはまる項目を全てを選択してください
SSA
社債(金融)
社債(非金融)
証券化商品
ネガティブ/ 排他的スクリーニング
ポジティブ/業界最高のスクリーニング
基準に基づくスクリーニング

04.2. 組織内でアクティブ運用している債券に適用するスクリーニングのアプローチを記載してください。

We identify companies for the investment universe that meet our positive and negative sustainability criteria. The most important element of this analysis is to determine which companies are on average ahead of their peers in terms of an active sustainability approach. These sector-specific ESG themes (environmental, social, governance) are covered by many different criteria as a basis to evaluate a firms' sustainability performance. The most progressive issuers in each sector are identified and selected for the sustainable investment universe. On this basis, the sustainable bond universe is determined. In addition to the positive screening, we apply several exclusion criteria for negative screening of companies such as nuclear energy, tobacco, or GMO or - when it comes to countries - death penalty.

04.3. 補足情報 [任意]

For our in-house ESG research:

CORPORATE BONDS  When evaluating an individual company's contribution to reducing environmental and social risks as well as how it exploits corresponding opportunities, we are using a matrix of criteria developed in-house. The matrix covers the following three aspects:

Environmental responsibility: a company's measures and initiatives to reduce the environmental impacts in production, supply chain and product usage. Social responsibility: a company's measures and initiatives to take into consideration the interests of customers, employees, suppliers and society as a whole, for example product safety, occupational health & safety, or working conditions at suppliers. Corporate governance: embedding sustainability aspects in corporate strategy and business model; management systems; corporate governance standards.

GOVERNMENT BONDS The two dimensions for the sustainability rating of government bonds are resource availability and resource productivity. Resource availability includes the current and future availability of a country's natural resources (primarily biocapacity minus ecological footprint), as well as its social and financial resources. Resource productivity measures the efficiency of transforming resources into material wealth (gross domestic product), the efficiency of the education and health system with respect to resource consumption, as well as the efficiency of a country's economic, political and social processes, plus the overall conditions.

PUBLIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Public financial institutions are state-supported banks with a set mandate, such as financing export activity or combating poverty. The definition of the mandate determines to what extent the institution is promoting sustainable development. The way how the mandate is implemented determines how the institution performs within the framework of a company's rating which is based on the rating criteria for banks.

PUBLIC COVERED BONDS Covered bonds are eligible for investment if both the issuer and cover pool are sustainable. The issuer rating follows the same methodology as corporate ratings within that sector, which in most cases are banks (described above, not shown here). The cover pool comprises loans to the public sector as well as government bonds. The sustainability rating of the cover pool thus corresponds to the weighted average rating of the countries financed.


FI 05. Examples of ESG factors in screening process (Private)


FI 06. Screening - ensuring criteria are met

06.1. 債券投資においてファンドスクリーニングの基準に違反がないことを確認するために組織が使用しているシステムを記載してください。

スクリーニングの種類
ネガティブ/排他的スクリーニング​
ポジティブ/業界最高のスクリーニング
基準に基づくスクリーニング​

06.2. 補足情報 [任意]

Additional Information regarding our in-house ESG research:

A sustainable investment approach makes it possible to systematically incorporate in the investment process the risks and rewards created by the interplay of environmental, social and economic forces acting on companies, governments and public institutions. In our ESG competence center, a team of six sustainability analysts is responsible for evaluating the sustainability credentials of sectors, individual companies, corporate and government bonds and public financial institutions.

Our sustainability analysis complements traditional financial analysis, and is a key element in the investment process for mandates. The starting point is the investment universe, which comprises the biggest securities in the respective asset class (usually the relevant benchmarks in the case of equities), as well as other investment ideas provided by Portfolio Management and Sustainability Research. The dedicated team of sustainability analysts is responsible for evaluating the sustainability credentials of sectors, individual companies, corporate and government bonds and public financial institutions.

The detailed evaluation criteria differ among the individual sectors, as do the weightings used to aggregate the assessments of these detailed criteria to arrive at an overall rating.

CORPORATE BONDS: The sustainability rating is composed of two dimensions, the Sector Rating and the Company Rating.

The Sector Rating assesses the company's exposure to environmental and social risks, primarily based upon on the environmental and social impacts of that particular industry. This is measured by environmental criteria such as carbon emissions, water consumption, air pollution and waste volumes; consideration is also given to social criteria such as working conditions (work accidents, staff turnover, wages and benefits) and the potential for social conflict (activities in countries with poor working conditions and human rights records, corruption, unfair competition, controversial products such as armaments, etc.). The entire value chain for the relevant sector is reviewed for this purpose (including the supply chain and the entire product life cycle).

The Company Rating assesses an individual company's contribution to reducing environmental and social risks and how well it exploits the corresponding opportunities. The rating is based upon a matrix of criteria developed in-house. The matrix covers the following three aspects:

  • Environmental responsibility: a company's measures and initiatives to reduce the environmental impacts in production, supply chain and product usage.

  • Social responsibility: a company's measures and initiatives to take into consideration the interests of customers, employees, suppliers and society as a whole, for example product safety, occupational health& safety, or working conditions at suppliers.

  • Corporate governance: embedding sustainability aspects in corporate strategy and business model; management systems; corporate governance standards.

GOVERNMENT BONDS The two dimensions for the sustainability rating of government bonds are resource availability and resource productivity. Resource availability includes the current and future availability of a country's natural resources (primarily biocapacity minus ecological footprint), as well as its social and financial resources. Resource productivity measures the efficiency of transforming resources into material wealth (gross domestic product), the efficiency of the education and health system with respect to resource consumption, as well as the efficiency of a country's economic, political and social processes, plus the overall conditions.

PUBLIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Public financial institutions are state-supported banks with a set mandate, such as financing export activity or combating poverty. The definition of the mandate determines to what extent the institution is promoting sustainable development. The way how the mandate is implemented determines how the institution performs within the framework of a company’s rating which is based on the rating criteria for banks.

PUBLIC COVERED BONDS Covered bonds are eligible for investment if both the issuer and cover pool are sustainable. The issuer rating follows the same methodology as corporate ratings within that sector, which in most cases are banks (described above, not shown here). The cover pool comprises loans to the public sector as well as government bonds. The sustainability rating of the cover pool thus corresponds to the weighted average rating of the countries financed.


Top