Public HTML RI reports - PRI reporting framework 2019

Bâtirente

PRI reporting framework 2019

Basic information [OO 01 - 09] Asset class implementation gateway indicators [OO 10 - 12] Peering questions [OO LE 01 - HF 01]

Strategy and Governance

Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Outsourcing to fiduciary managers and investment consultants [SG 12] ESG issues in asset allocation [SG 13 - 15] Asset class implementation not reported in other modules [SG 16 - 17] Innovation [SG 18] Communication [SG 19]

Indirect – Manager Selection, Appointment and Monitoring

Listed Equity and Fixed Income Strategies [SAM 01] Selection [SAM 02 - 03] Appointment [SAM 04] Monitoring [SAM 05 - 07] Outputs and outcomes [SAM 08 - 09]

Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership

Overview [LEA 01] Engagement [LEA 02 - 08] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 09 - 11]

Direct - Hedge Funds

Confidence building measures

Confidence building measures [CM1 01 - 07]

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

LEA 12. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions (Not Completed)

LEA 13. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 14. Securities lending programme

14.1. Indicate if your organisation has a securities lending programme.

Yes

14.3. Indicate how voting is addressed in your securities lending programme.

We recall all securities for voting on all ballot items

We maintain some holdings, so we can vote at any time

We systematically recall some securities so that we can vote on their ballot items (e.g., in line with specific criteria)

We recall some securities so that we can vote on their ballot items on an ad hoc basis

We empower our securities lending agent to decide when to recall securities for voting purposes

We do not recall our shares for voting purposes

Other specify;

14.4. Additional information.

LEA 15. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management (Not Completed)

LEA 16. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management (Not Completed)

LEA 17. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast (Not Completed)

LEA 18. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Not Completed)

LEA 19. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions (Not Completed)

LEA 20. Shareholder resolutions

20.1. Indicate if your organisation directly or through a service provider filed or co-filed any ESG shareholder resolutions during the reporting year.

Yes

20.2. Indicate the number of ESG shareholder resolutions you filed or co-filed.

1 Total number

20.6. Describe whether your organisation reviews ESG shareholder resolutions filed by other investors.

Æquo (our engagement service provider) systematically reviews shareholders' resolutions concerning the companies with which it has a dialogue on our behalf.

20.7. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 21. Examples of (proxy) voting activities

21.1. Provide examples of the (proxy) voting activities that your organisation and/or service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Add Example 1

ESG Topic	Executive Remuneration Executive Remuneration Climate Change Human rights Company leadership issues Pollution General ESG Diversity Shareholder rights Health and Safety Sustainability reporting Water risks Labour practices and supply chain management Anti-bribery and corruption Deforestation Aggressive tax planning Cyber security Political spending / lobbying Other governance Plastics Other
Conducted by
Objectives	To ensure that executive remuneration is aligned with shareholder interests.
Scope and Process	We voted against Compensation Report of 70 companies (out of 95 votes) because their compensation plan included stock options.
Outcomes

Add Example 2

ESG Topic	Other governance Executive Remuneration Climate Change Human rights Company leadership issues Pollution General ESG Diversity Shareholder rights Health and Safety Sustainability reporting Water risks Labour practices and supply chain management Anti-bribery and corruption Deforestation Aggressive tax planning Cyber security Political spending / lobbying Other governance Plastics Other
Conducted by
Objectives	To ensure the independence of the board.
Scope and Process	We opposed the election of 251 (out of 1077) directors because they had been on the board for more than 10 years
Outcomes

Add Example 3

ESG Topic	Other governance Executive Remuneration Climate Change Human rights Company leadership issues Pollution General ESG Diversity Shareholder rights Health and Safety Sustainability reporting Water risks Labour practices and supply chain management Anti-bribery and corruption Deforestation Aggressive tax planning Cyber security Political spending / lobbying Other governance Plastics Other
Conducted by
Objectives	To ensure that the interests and concerns of both classes of shareholders are aligned.
Scope and Process	We voted in favor of two shareholder proposals requesting separate disclosure of voting results by share class (A and B).
Outcomes

Add Example 4

Add Example 5

Add Example 6

Add Example 7

Add Example 8

Add Example 9

Add Example 10

21.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Previous Section Next Section