This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

UBS Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

Overview

LEA 01. Description of approach to engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

01.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal engagement policy.

01.2. Attach or provide a URL to your engagement policy.

01.3. Indicate what your engagement policy covers:

          Our approach to collaborative engagement; our escalation strategies and the relationship with proxy voting.
        

01.4. Provide a brief overview of your organization’s approach to engagement

UBS AM views engagement as an integral part of our investment process and overall approach to stewardship. It can be difficult to judge the effectiveness of a board from outside the boardroom and we believe that effective monitoring is essential. We seek to develop both a long-term relationship and an understanding of mutual objectives and concerns with the companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients.

Our approach involves the following:

Our analysts and portfolio managers regularly monitor their investee companies and have frequent meetings with company executives and non-executive board members, both before and after any investment. Such meetings give us the opportunity to judge the success of the 'outputs' of governance - such as the strategy, acquisitions, capital allocation and operational performance.

Engagement with company management on any environment, social and governance issues that we identify may also be undertaken by our Corporate Governance area. On an on-going basis we monitor corporate developments through market news sources and company announcements. To identify issues of concern and to help with the monitoring of investee companies we use both internal information shared upon our proprietary databases, together with external specialist sell-side broker research and ESG rating tools.

01.6. Additional information [optional]

Through our engagement we encourage companies to ensure that at all times:

- The whole board and management is fully involved in endorsing strategy and in all major strategic decisions (e.g., mergers and acquisitions),

- The board and management satisfy themselves that the company's leadership is effective,

- Appropriate management succession plans are in place,

- The board receives all the information necessary to hold management to account,

- The interests of executives and shareholders are aligned,

- The financial audit is independent and accurate,

- The board provides accurate oversight of environmental and social risks and opportunities,

- The brand and reputation of the company is protected and enhanced.

There may be occasions when, despite discussions with companies, our concerns have not been sufficiently addressed. If a company fails to meet our expectations and we are not satisfied through our regular engagement process with the explanations provided, we will seek to escalate our concerns with the board. In the first instance, this is likely to be through further discussions with the chairman or other senior non-executives.

Such engagements are selective and focused around where we have identified particular issues. We are particularly keen to engage early with companies in order to minimise the loss of shareholder value. Factors for intervention with a company include where our assessment is that shareholder's interests are at risk as a result of a governance failing.

In making decisions as to whether to escalate our engagement we will consider the following:

− The circumstances which have led to our concern,

− The materiality of the potential negative impact,

− Best practice standards, including national guidelines,

− Any explanation provided by the company,

− The significance of the issue for our clients,

− Any pattern of concerns over a period of time,

− The likelihood of success.

If a company consistently fails to meet our expectations, or if a company’s ESG disclosures are insufficient to allow for investors to gain an appropriate understanding of a company’s sustainability-related risks, we may decide to vote against management proposals at the shareholder meeting, including the election of board candidates.

We regard any such action, however, as representing a breakdown in our longer-term relationship with the company. We are only likely to pursue this course when the company's performance has been extremely poor or the board has consistently ignored what we believe to be the legitimate concerns of shareholders.


LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues

02.1. Indicate the method of engagement, giving reasons for the interaction.

Type of engagement

Reason for interaction

Individual/Internal staff engagements
Collaborative engagements
Service provider engagements

Please specify why your organisation does not engage via service providers.

We believe that engagement is an intrinsic part of the investment decision making process. We prefer to engage directly with our investee companies to express our views, learn about their practices and share any insights internally with our investment teams.

02.2. Additional information. [Optional]


Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take during and following your engagements activities carried out by internal staff.

04.3. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.4. Additional information. [Optional]


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagements

05.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise collaborative engagements.

05.3. Additional information [Optional]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

06.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities carried out collaboratively.

06.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions companies take during and following your collaborative engagements.

06.3. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your collaborative engagement activities.

06.4. Additional information. [Optional]

Where we believe the effectiveness of engagement and the chance of success can be increased, we are willing to work both formally and informally with collective bodies, or to collaborate with other shareholders. This particularly applies where we have a small holding in a company where we feel that individual engagement would not have a strong likelihood of success. At the same time, we will join a collaborative initiative only in a situation when we have the necessary internal resources to contribute meaningfully to the dialogue with companies and the objectives of the collaboration.

Prior to undertaking any collaboration with other investors we will first review the following:

- That any collaboration or action with others investors is permitted by law and/or regulation;

- General agreement amongst investors on issues of concern and potential solutions;

- Responsiveness of management or board to direct individual engagement;

- That engagement will be private and that any public statements have our prior explicit authorisation;

As part of our collaboration efforts we also maintain an active participation in both formal and informal investor networks in order to ensure that we are aware of best practice in the area of corporate governance, social and environmental matters and to improve dialogue between institutional investors and other stakeholder groups.


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers

09.1. Indicate if insights gained from your engagements are shared with your internal or external investment managers.

Type of engagement

Insights shared

Individual/Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

09.2. Additional information. [Optional]

All engagements undertaken by the Stewardship team are shared on an internal database and the information may be incorporated by our investment areas into their decision and oversight process. We have also recently introduced a new mechanism to allow analysts and portfolio managers to tag conversations on ESG issues included in their regular research and meetings with companies.


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of your engagement activities.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

All engagements undertaken by the Stewardship team are shared on an internal database and the information may be incorporated by our investment areas into their decision and oversight process.


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort (Private)


LEA 12. Engagement methods (Private)


LEA 13. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement (Private)


LEA 14. Examples of ESG engagements (Private)


Top