This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Nykredit Realkredit Group

PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Outputs and outcomes

成果および結果

LEA 21. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

21.1. 貴社やサービスプロバイダーが(代理)投票の指示を発行するマンデートを有している上場株式について、報告年度中に行った投票の割合を記載してください。

1%単位の投票率

58 %

この投票率の計算基準を明記してください

21.2. 一定の株式保有分について議決権を行使しない理由を説明して下さい:

21.3. Additional information. [Optional]

Nykredit participated in 589 AGM's in 2017. Nykredit voted on 7928 proposals. At 8,4% of the proposals Nykredit voted against managements recommendations. At 0.3% of the proposals Nykredit voted against the recommendations of our proxy advisor. Most often the reasons for voting against management was governance issues with independence first and remuneration second. Other ESG-issues played a smaller yet growing role.

Nykredit has an ambition to vote at the AGM's of the companies in our actively internally managed funds. In 2017 we managed to vote on more than 90% of the AGM's of the companies in those funds. We did not reach 100% due to trading or registration issues. The number was lower in the externally managed funds but still the large majority was voted on. As a consequence to this prioritation less than half of the AGM's in the passive funds were voted.

Some votes were not implemented as planned due to technical issues between the proxy advisor and depositary service. This was the case for the dedicated Danish equities funds. This has since been resolved. Nykredit also experienced issues regarding lack of power of attoruneys on some issuers. 


LEA 22. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

22.1. あなたの貴社では、貴社や貴社に代わって行動するサービスプロバイダーが出した議決権行使に係る指示を追跡しているかどうか明示してください。

22.2. 貴社または貴社の代理である第3者機関が出した議決権行使に係る指示について投票の割合を記載してください。

議決権行使に係る指示の対象
投票の内訳(%)
経営陣の議案に対する賛成票
91 %
経営陣の議案に対する反対票
8.4 %
棄権
0.6 %
100%

22.3. 経営陣の提案に反対票を投じた後にあなたの貴社が取る措置について記載して下さい。

          Before voting against management there is a discussion between the PM and ESG-team including analysis and the active ownership action plan for that company. If at all possible the company is contacted beforehand. Otherwise the issue is added to the active ownership action plan for that company.
        

22.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 23. Shareholder resolutions

この指標には新しい設問が追加されています。事前に入力されている回答を精査してください。

 

23.1. 貴社が直接またはサービスプロバイダーを経由して報告年度にESG関連の株主決議を提出または共同提出したかどうかを明示してください。

23.6. 貴社が他の投資家によって提出されたESG株主決議を審査するかどうかについて説明してください。

Nykredit supported a number of ESG shareholderresolutions, i.e. the Aiming for A on Exxon and the Say on pay at BP. We support a number of collaborative engagements that has taken initiative to put forward resolutions, but have yet to do so on our own.

23.7. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 24. Examples of (proxy) voting activities

この指標には新しい設問が追加されています。事前に入力されている回答を精査してください。

24.1. 報告年度に貴社またはサービスプロバイダーが実行した(委任状による)議決権行使の例を提供してください。

ESG Factors
ESG問題
          Exxon should present scenario analysis in light of the COP21 and how this effects strategy
        
意思決定者
目的

To protect the development of the investors assets Exxon needs do a risk analysis on how the global plans to reduce carbon emmisions will affect the business.

対象範囲およびプロセス

Participate in building support for this view among investors and fuel change with major potential climate impact.

結果

Nykredit palyed a small part in the large coalition of investors that gained a majority of votes behind the proposal, which resulted in Exxon now presenting scenario analysis and discussing strategy.

ESG Factors
ESG問題
          Getting pay and performance aligned at BP
        
意思決定者
目的

Making sure pay and performance are aligned at BP.

対象範囲およびプロセス

Making the investor voice heard that pay and performance need to be linked.

結果

Part of a large coalition rejecting the boards remuneration proposal for the BP-management. 

ESG Factors
ESG問題
          Board independence at KDDI
        
意思決定者
目的

Board independence is a recognized risk mitigating factor and getting a more independent board should support a more profitable company.

対象範囲およびプロセス

Vote against board candidates not independent and taking this up with the company as part of our active ownership action plan.

結果

24.2. Additional information. [Optional]


Top