This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.


PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions


LEA 15. Voting policy & approach

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

15.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal voting policy.

15.2. Indicate what your voting policy covers:

15.3. Attach or provide a URL to your voting policy. [Optional]

15.4. Provide a brief overview of your organization’s approach to (proxy) voting.

AP1, AP3, AP3 and AP4 operated a joint electronic voting platform, based on the AP funds’ governance policies. Most issues are managed automatically via the voting platform, with the exception of matters such as remuneration issues, which are forwarded to the funds for individual assessment. Each fund decides individually as to how it will vote. AP2  mainly votes in : Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and the USA. The criteria for determining the companies in which the Fund should exercise its voting rights derive mainly from the MSCI global index. There are other criteria too, such as when the Fund is engaged in a dialogue on a specific issue with a company and/or when the Fund has submitted a shareholder proposal for consideration by the AGM.  AP2 employs an external party for the practical voting process and submits a written vote (proxy voting) using the electronic voting platform.

AP2 is positive towards filing and/or co-filing resolutions.


LEA 16. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

16.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.


Based on

16.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure your voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made (if applicable).

The voting platform provider send monthly reports with details regarding the voting.

16.3. Additional information.[Optional]

LEA 17. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 18. Confirmation of votes (Not Completed)

LEA 19. Securities lending programme

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

19.1. Indicate if your organisation has a securities lending programme.

19.3. Indicate how voting is addressed in your securities lending programme.

          AP2 lends out Swedish equities only in exceptional cases, and never more than 90 percent of its holdings in an individual Swedish or foreign company. Where Swedish equities are loaned out, they are recalled prior to the AGM. AP2 places a ceiling on the maximum value of such lending.

LEA 20. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

20.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

20.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

20.3. Additional information. [Optional]

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 21. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

21.1. For listed equities where you and/or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

31 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

21.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting certain holdings

21.3. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 22. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

22.1. Indicate if you track the voting instructions that you and/or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

22.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
72 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
28 %
0 %

22.3. Describe the actions you take in relation to voting against management recommendations.

          Every year, to further improve communication with its foreign portfolio companies, AP2 has written to some 50 of these companies, clarifying its views on active governance and the importance of exercising voting rights. In these letters, AP2 also explains the reasons it has felt unable to support the recommendations of the boards on specific proposals. In several cases, these letters have resulted in further contact with the companies in question, sometimes by letter but also in the form of teleconferences.

22.4. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 23. Shareholder resolutions

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

23.1. Indicate if your organisation directly or via a service provider filed or co-filed any ESG shareholder resolutions during the reporting year.

23.6. Describe whether your organisation reviews ESG shareholder resolutions filed by other investors.

Yes, to review ESG shareholder resolutions filed by other investors are part of the proxy voting process.

23.7. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 24. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)