This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund

PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » General processes for all three groups of engagers

General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers

09.1. Indicate if insights gained from your engagements are shared with your internal or external investment managers.

Type of engagement

Insights shared

Individual/Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

Service provider engagements

09.2. Additional information. [Optional]

IMD has holistically merged the ESG/engagement process into all internal equity teams. Corporate 1 x 1 meetings discuss the following aspects of each engagement:

  • Portfolio investment theme
  • Investment theme
  • Catalysts
  • Risks
  • ESG Engagement (Qualitative Analysis)
    • Enviromental 
    • Social
    • Corporate Governance
  • Materaility Matrix
    • Quantitative Validation 
  • ISS - UNGC - PRI Benchmarking
  • Internal Overall Assessment Recommendation 
  • Validate Engagement


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of your engagement activities.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

Service provider engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

Engagement is tracked through the  customized Proxy Voting metrics of our proxy voting service provider, which utilize strict sustainbale voting guidleines as a benchmark.

ISS has, therefore, developed proxy voting guidelines that are consistent with the objectives of sustainability-minded investors and fiduciaries.  On matters of ESG import, ISS' Sustainability Policy seeks to promote support for recognized global governing bodies promoting sustainable business practices advocating for stewardship of environment, fair labor practices, non-discrimination, and the protection of human rights. Generally, ISS' Sustainability Policy will  take as its frame of reference internationally recognized sustainability-related initiatives such as the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI), United Nations Global Compact, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Carbon Principles, International Labour Organization Conventions (ILO), CERES Principles, Global Sullivan Principles, MacBride Principles, and environmental and social European Union Directives. Each of these efforts promote a fair, unified and productive reporting and compliance environment which advances positive corporate ESG actions that promote practices that present new opportunities or that mitigate related financial and reputational risks. 
On matters of corporate governance, executive compensation, and corporate structure, the Sustainability Policy guidelines are based on a commitment to create and preserve economic value and to advance principles of good corporate governance. 
These guidelines provide an overview of how ISS approaches proxy voting issues for subscribers of the Sustainability Policy.  We note there may be cases in which the final vote recommendation at a particular company varies from the voting guidelines due to the fact that we closely examine the merits of each proposal and consider relevant information and company-specific circumstances in arriving at our decisions.  To that end, ISS engages with both interested shareholders as well as issuers to gain further insight into contentious issues facing the company. Where ISS acts as voting agent for clients, it follows each client’s voting policy, which may differ in some cases from the policies outlined in this document.  ISS updates its guidelines on an annual basis to take into account emerging issues and trends on environmental, social and corporate governance topics, as well as the evolution of market standards, regulatory changes and client feedback