This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

GEROA PENTSIOAK E.P.S.V. de EMPLEO

PRI reporting framework 2018

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Incorporation » ESG incorporation in actively managed listed equities » Implementation processes » (A) Implementation: Screening

(A) Implementation: Screening

LEI 04. Types of screening applied

04.1. Indicate and describe the type of screening you apply to your internally managed active listed equities.

Type of screening

Screened by

Description

1) Negative screening: Equity (excluding Funds and ETF):

  • Exclusion by country according to the Human Development Index (HDI) of the United Nations. A minimum of 95% (including corporate fixed and convertible bonds) should be in countries that are classified with a high or very high HDI.

 

 

 

Screened by

Description

Positive/best-in-class screening

1) Positive screening: Equity (excluding Funds and ETF):

ESG rankings published by Sustainalytics and RobecoSAM are used to analyze the company and position with respect to their comparable although the criterion of the company's position is not an exclusionary criterion.

Geroa Pentsioak EPSV guarantees that at least 50% of the investment in Corporate Fixed Income and in Equity is located within companies that have a higher score than 70 on the mentioned rankings (being 100 the top score).

2) Positive screening: ETF and Equity Funds:

Analysis of SRI policies used by management entities and subscriptions to different initiatives (UNPRI, Un Global Compact, GRI...).

A minimum of 75% of the investments shall be made through entities who have implemented ESG policies in their investment processes, or who are UNPRI signatories.

Screened by

          Sustainalytics' controversy research
        

Description

1) Norm-based screening: Equity (excluding Funds and ETF):

Norm-based exclusion: An analysis of controversies is performed and it is ensured that none of the companies breaches any of the UN Global Compact principles. If an entity is involved in a serious controversy level (4 or 5 according to Sustainalytics) or if a company breaches any of the of the UN Global Compact principles, automatically that security will be in an observation period. In general basis, the positions in these securities will not be increased. The investment team along with management will decide if the security should be considered not suitable to keep it in the portfolio. If the security is declared unfit, the positions will be disposed as soon as possible.

In 2017: all the positions in securities with 5 level of controversy or non-compliance of UN Global Compact were disposed.

2) Norm-based screening: Funds and ETF:

Norm-Based exclusion: An analysis of controversies is performed and it is ensured that none of the Management Entities breaches any of the UN Global Compact principles.

In 2017: We did not invest through Managing Entities with 5 level of controversy or/and non-compliance of UN Global Compact principles.

 

 

 

 

04.2. Describe how the screening criteria are established, how often the criteria are reviewed and how you notify clients and/or beneficiaries when changes are made.

The periodical control is conducted on quarterly basis and the SRI policies are reviewed annually. The SRI policies are disclosed in the website.


LEI 05. Processes to ensure screening is based on robust analysis

05.1. Indicate which processes your organisation uses to ensure screening is based on robust analysis.

05.3. Indicate how frequently third party ESG ratings are updated for screening purposes.

05.5. Additional information. [Optional]


LEI 06. Processes to ensure fund criteria are not breached (Private)


Top