This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Aktia Bank p.l.c.

PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

Overview

LEA 15. Voting policy & approach

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

15.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal voting policy.

15.2. Indicate what your voting policy covers:

15.3. Attach or provide a URL to your voting policy. [Optional]

15.4. Provide a brief overview of your organization’s approach to (proxy) voting.

Please see the policy document at the above link.("omistajapolitiikka")


Process

LEA 16. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

16.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

16.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure your voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made (if applicable).

The persons attending AGM's who cast the votes report on the votings afterwards to the responsible investment coordinators.

16.3. Additional information.[Optional]


LEA 17. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 18. Confirmation of votes (Not Completed)


LEA 19. Securities lending programme (Private)


LEA 20. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

20.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

20.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

          In the AGM's where we participated during 2017 there were no votings where we voted against management recommendations. If there would have been a case where the funds managed by Aktia would have excercised their voting rights against management recommendations, we would have informed company management about our rationale/views.
        

20.3. Additional information. [Optional]


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 21. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

21.1. For listed equities where you and/or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

100 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

21.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting certain holdings

21.3. Additional information. [Optional]

At the AGM's where we participated in 2017, all relevant issues were approved without the need for voting. Participation at AGM's is prioritized based on Aktia Fund Management Companys ownership policy.


LEA 22. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

22.1. Indicate if you track the voting instructions that you and/or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

22.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
100 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
0 %
Abstentions
0 %
100%

22.3. Describe the actions you take in relation to voting against management recommendations.

          If we decide to vote against management recommendations, we inform management on about this and the rationale behind our decision.
        

22.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 23. Shareholder resolutions (Not Completed)


LEA 24. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Private)


Top