This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd.

PRI reporting framework 2018

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions

(Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions


LEA 15. Voting policy & approach

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

15.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal voting policy.

15.2. Indicate what your voting policy covers:

15.3. Attach or provide a URL to your voting policy. [Optional]


Attach document

15.4. Provide a brief overview of your organization’s approach to (proxy) voting.

The global proxy research and voting services of ISS are employed to help analyze and vote proxies on behalf of our clients. ISS prepares the voting recommendations for all items for which we are entitled to vote. We review these recommendations to ensure that they correctly reflect our position and make changes where appropriate. Unusual proposals are identified and reviewed in greater detail by the portfolio manager with direct responsibility for that investment within the context of our proxy voting guidelines. The rationale for changes in voting recommendations is documented by the portfolio manager.


LEA 16. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

16.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.


Based on

16.2. Provide an overview of how you ensure your voting policy is adhered to, giving details of your approach when exceptions to the policy are made (if applicable).

The Entitlements team within the Investment Resource Group (IRG) provide support by supplying reporting of upcoming votes to managers and monitoring ballots ready for voting.

16.3. Additional information.[Optional]

LEA 17. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 18. Confirmation of votes (Not Completed)

LEA 19. Securities lending programme (Not Completed)

LEA 20. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

20.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

20.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

20.3. Additional information. [Optional]

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 21. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

21.1. For listed equities where you and/or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

97 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

21.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting certain holdings

          While CC&L takes its voting responsibilities very seriously and uses best efforts to exercise these rights in all cases, there may be situations when it may be impractical or impossible for CC&L to vote. Such circumstances include a limited number of international markets where share blocking applies. Due to the liquidity and administrative challenges, CC&L will typically not vote in these situations, but may deviate from this approach if the situation warrants.

21.3. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 22. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

22.1. Indicate if you track the voting instructions that you and/or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

22.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
91.7 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
8.2 %
.1 %

22.3. Describe the actions you take in relation to voting against management recommendations.

          In order to understand company-specific issues, a significant commitment is made to management interviews. This includes personally interviewing the key decision-makers of each company in our coverage universe. When we vote against management, we use these meetings as an opportunity to communicate our rationale, listen to the perspective of management as well as express our desired outcome. The key takeaways from these meetings are used to establish specific milestones expected to drive value creation or changes to the area of concern regarding the vote. These are monitored with subsequent follow-up meetings or phone calls.

22.4. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 23. Shareholder resolutions (Private)

LEA 24. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)