This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Northern Ireland Local Government Officers' Superannuation Committee

PRI reporting framework 2018

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » Process for engagements run internally

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

NILGOSC writes to all UK and other European listed companies when it has voted against resolutions at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) to outline the rationale for the decision. NILGOSC aims to write to these companies in advance of the meetings whenever possible.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take during and following your engagements activities carried out by internal staff.

04.3. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

other description

          Company responses recorded and progress reviewed before future meetings to inform voting decisions and/or continued engagement.
        

04.4. Additional information. [Optional]

For all votes against management at UK and other European listed companies' AGMs, NILGOSC writes to outline the rationale for the decision. If a response is received before the meeting, the information may be used to inform voting decisions. If a response is received after the meeting, the response will be noted and reviewed before any future meetings. Where a company has indicated that future improvements will be made, progress will be reviewed and used to inform voting decisions and/or continued engagement.


Top