This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Northern Ireland Local Government Officers' Superannuation Committee

PRI reporting framework 2018

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagements

05.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise collaborative engagements.

other description

          Fund exposure, compatibility with NILGOSC's responsible investment policies and resources required
        

05.3. Additional information [Optional]

Collaborative engagements are identified through the PRI or other organisations such as the CDP or the UK Pension Fund Responsible Investment Roundtable. The decision on whether to participate is based on fund exposure, compatibility with NILGOSC's responsible investment policies and resources required, and is approved by the Investment Services Manager and Deputy Secretary.


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

06.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities carried out collaboratively.

06.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions companies take during and following your collaborative engagements.

06.3. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your collaborative engagement activities.

06.4. Additional information. [Optional]

NILGOSC participated in two relevant collaborative engagements through UNPRI, both of which have set goals and timelines. Meetings took place regularly and progress was tracked through updates from members.

For LAPFF-initiated engagements, progress was monitored by the service provider and progress reports  provided to members in the form of the Quarterly Engagement Report. Before each engagement meeting LAPFF sets out two or three objectives, then following the meeting an indication is provided of whether these objectives were achieved and, if so, how. An assessment is provided of progress, ranging from ‘no progress’ to ’substantial improvement’.

 


Top