Public HTML RI reports - PRI reporting framework 2017

BNP Paribas Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

Basic Information [OO 01 - 09] Gateway asset class implementation indicators [OO 10 - 12]

Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Implementation not in other modules [SG 12 - 16] Innovation [SG 17]

Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership

Engagement [LEA 01 - 16] Overview [LEA 01 - 02] Process for engagements run internally [LEA 03 - 04] Process for engagements conducted via collaborations [LEA 05 - 06] General processes for all three groups of engagers [LEA 09 - 10] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 11 - 15] Communication [LEA 16]

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process

Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

Yes

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

Geography/market of the companies targeted

Materiality of ESG factors

Systemic risks to global portfolios

Exposure (holdings)

In reaction to ESG impacts which has already taken place

As a response to divestment pressure

As a follow-up from a voting decision

Client request

Other, describe

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

In 2016, the key areas of our engagement activity were:

Climate change and transition to a low-carbon economy

Real Estate and building sector: Energy Efficiency - financing the transition to a low-carbon economy
CO2 and energy consmption reporting
Energy Sector: Carbon asset risk, Fracking fluids in hydraulic fracking, Artic exploration
Sustainable Agriculture: Environmental impacts in food supply chains

Social topics

Pharmaceuticals: Clinical trials transparency, Access to Medicine
Food Value Chain: Labour Standards, Access to Nutrition, Sustainable Agricultural supply chains, Farm animal welfare
Textile, apparel and luxury: Labour standards, H&S in supply chains, Accord on Fire and Building Safety for Bangladesh, Animal welfare

Governance topics

Executive pay
Bribery and corruption
Director nomination process

LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

Yes

Yes, for all engagement activities

Yes, for the majority of engagement activities

Yes, for a minority of engagement activities

We do not define specific objectives for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take following your engagements.

Yes

Yes, in all cases

Yes, in the majority of cases

Yes, in the minority of cases

We do not monitor the actions that companies take following engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

Yes

04.4. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

Define timelines for milestones and goals

Tracking, monitoring progress against defined milestones and goals

Establish a process for when the goals are not met

Revisit and, if necessary revise goals on continuous basis

Other, please specify

04.5. Additional information. [Optional]

Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagements

Yes

05.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise collaborative engagements

Potential to learn from other investors

Ability to add value to the collaboration

Geography / market of the companies targeted

Materiality of ESG factors

Systemic risks to global portfolios

Exposure (holdings)

In response to ESG impacts which has already taken place

In response to divestment pressure

Client requests

Other, describe

05.3. Additional information [Optional]

LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

06.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities carried out collaboratively.

Yes

Yes, for all engagement activities

Yes, for the majority of engagement activities

Yes, for a minority of engagement activities

We do not define specific objectives for engagement activities carried out collaboratively.

06.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions companies take following your collaborative engagements.

Yes

Yes, in all cases

Yes, in the majority of cases

Yes, in the minority of cases

We do not monitor the actions that companies take following engagement activities carried out collaboratively

06.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals related to engagement activities carried out via collaborations.

Yes

06.4. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your collaborative engagement activities.

Define timelines for milestones and goals

Tracking, monitoring progress against defined milestones and goals

Establish a process for when the goals are not met

Revisit and, if necessary revise the goals on a continuous basis

Other, please specify

06.5. Additional information. [Optional]

Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers

LEA 07. Role in engagement process (Not Applicable)

LEA 08. Monitor / discuss service provider information (Not Applicable)

General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)

LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of engagements your organisation participates in.

Type of engagement	Tracking engagements
Individual / Internal staff engagements	Yes, we track the number of our engagements in full Yes, we partially track the number of our engagements We do not track
Collaborative engagements	Yes, we track the number of our engagements in full Yes, we partially track the number of our engagements We do not track and cannot estimate our engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

We keep a detailed file for all engagements. We also receive detailed updates on our collaborative engagements focused on concrete asks. As explained above, there are several individual and collective engagements that are less focused on a 'one off demand' and that are more long term (e.g. the Access to Medicine index) or that are related to public policy. For these engagements we do not keep such a detailed record. We see it as part of our continuous engagement.

Previous Section Next Section