This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.
You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Outputs and outcomes
It depends on a number of factors. In many cases we engage with companies before the AGM to inform our intention to vote no. At other time we inform that we intend to vote no in the future if they do not change specific paramaters of the proposal, and then do so the coming season. We strive to have an active contact with companies on issues that are especially important to us.
Went to vote
Were withdrawn for other reasons
Aiming for A, mining resolutions
Updating institutions on Nordeas capital policy
We vote on thousands of different issues, and we always have the finally decision point in house. We also engage with companies to make them amend suggestions before the AGM. For example did we write letters to a number of institutions last year updating them on our capital policy, and made recommendations for a more limited approach in the 2016 season.
Some folloewd our recommendation, other did not, and we hence voted against.