This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

RBC Global Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » Process for engagements run internally

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

Our ESG-focused engagements are chosen and prioritized using a risk-based approach, which focuses on the  materiality of the ESG risks and opportunities facing each company and the size of our investment in it. In addition, there has been a recent increase in the number of issuers proactively engaging with us, in part due to past voting decisions.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take following your engagements.

04.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.4. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.5. Additional information. [Optional]

We monitor the progress of a company in implementing its plans to address ESG-related issues by continuing to communicate with the company and analyzing data and research related to the company and/or industry. Since each engagement is unique, the measurement of any tangible outcomes will depend on the particular circumstances. Similarly, the established process in the case of unachieved goals or unfulfilled issuer commitments is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.


Top