This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Maple-Brown Abbott Limited

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

Overview

LEA 01. Description of approach to engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

01.1. 貴社に正式なエンゲージメントポリシーがあるかどうか示してください

01.2. エンゲージメントポリシーがカバーしている内容を示してください。

01.3. エンゲージメントポリシーのURLを記載してください。[任意]

01.4. エンゲージメントに対する貴社のアプローチの概要を説明してください。

For Australian investments, in addition to biannual meetings with the management of portfolio companies following financial results and meetings with company Chairmen before the company AGM, Maple-Brown Abbott have a policy to conduct a minimum of an additional ten ESG engagement meetings with portfolio companies.  These meetings provide a further forum to engage with companies on their ESG performance and advocate for improvement in ESG performance and disclosure.  These dedicated ESG engagement meetings are prioritised each year with consideration to the materiality of ESG factors identified in the investment analysis and decision-making process.

For our self-managed International investments, the Company generally meets with the management of portfolio companies during company road shows and analyst company visits and at conferences.  The ESG related engagement at these meetings tends to focus on Corporate Governance.

The Company also engages with companies, and collaborates with our peers, outside these scheduled meetings, when it is in our clients’ long term interest to do so.  The Company does not use an external engagement service provider. 

01.5. 補足情報 [任意]

Maple-Brown Abbott's Code of Ethics (CofE) contains a section on Conflicts of Interest, as such, Conflicts of Interest are not duplicated in the Engagement Policy.


LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues (Not Completed)


Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメント活動を特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

03.2. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する際に使用する基準を説明してください。

その他

          1) Duration since last engagement meeting; and 2) Size of active weight in portfolio.
        

03.3. 補足情報。 [任意]


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. 協働的なエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

05.2. 協働的エンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する際に使用する基準を説明してください。

05.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. 貴社がエンゲージメントしている企業の数を追跡しているかどうかを記載してください。

エンゲージメントの種類
エンゲージメントの追跡
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

10.2. 補足情報。[任意]

Maple-Brown Abbott have a systematic process for recording individual engagements in our proprietary investment management system.


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort (Private)


LEA 12. Engagement methods (Private)


LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement (Private)


LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements (Private)


Top