This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Baillie Gifford

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Strategy and Governance » Investment policy

Investment policy

SG 01. RI policy and coverage (Not Completed)


SG 02. Publicly available RI policy or guidance documents (Not Completed)


SG 03. Conflicts of interest

03.1. Indicate if your organisation has a policy on managing potential conflicts of interest in the investment process.

03.2. Describe your policy on managing potential conflicts of interest in the investment process.

We recognise the importance of managing potential conflicts of interest that may exist when we vote a proxy solicited by a company with whom we have a material business or personal relationship. The Corporate Governance Team is responsible for monitoring possible material conflicts of interest with respect to proxy voting. Application of the Guidelines to vote proxies will, in most instances, adequately address any possible conflicts of interest. However, as noted above, we do not rigidly apply the Guidelines. For proxy votes that involve a potential conflict of interest, or are inconsistent with (or not covered by) the Guidelines but are consistent with management’s recommendation, our Management Committee will review the voting rationale, consider whether business relationships between Baillie Gifford and the company have influenced the proposed inconsistent vote and decide the course of action to be taken in the best interest of our clients. The Management Committee’s decision and rationale will be documented. If we invest on behalf of our clients in in-house pooled vehicles, we provide such clients with the opportunity to direct how their units in these funds should be voted on non-routine matters.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]


SG 04. Identifying incidents occurring within portfolios (Private)


Top