This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (Norwegian Ministry of Finance and Norges Bank Investment Management)

PRI reporting framework 2017

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 23. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

23.1. For listed equities where you and/or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

98 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

23.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting certain holdings

23.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 24. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

24.1. Indicate if you track the voting instructions that you and/or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

24.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
94 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
6 %
Abstentions
0 %
100%

24.3. Describe the actions you take after voting against management recommendations.

          We voted at more than 11,000 meetings, with 6% of voted against management. We do not regard it as practical to follow up on all against votes. In the cases where we have an ongoing engagement with a company or if it is a major holding, we are more likely to communicate our against vote either ahead of the meeting or after the meeting.
        

24.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 25. Shareholder resolutions (Not Completed)


LEA 26. Examples of (proxy) voting activities (Not Completed)


Top