Public HTML RI reports - PRI reporting framework 2017

ACTIAM

PRI reporting framework 2017

Basic Information [OO 01 - 09] Gateway asset class implementation indicators [OO 10 - 12]

Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Implementation not in other modules [SG 12 - 16] Innovation [SG 17]

Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership

Engagement [LEA 01 - 16] Overview [LEA 01 - 02] Process [LEA 03 - 10] Process for engagements run internally [LEA 03 - 04] Process for engagements conducted via collaborations [LEA 05 - 06] Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers [LEA 07 - 08] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 11 - 15] Communication [LEA 16]

Direct - Inclusive Finance

Context [IFD 01 - 06] PIIF Principle 1: Range of services [IFD 07 - 10] PIIF Principle 2: Client protection [IFD 11 - 13] PIIF Principle 3: Fair treatment [IFD 14 - 17] PIIF Principle 4: Responsible investment [IFD 18 - 24] PIIF Principle 5: Transparency [IFD 25 - 27] PIIF Principle 6: Balanced returns [IFD 28 - 31] PIIF Principle 7: Standards [IFD 32 - 34]

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » General processes for all three groups of engagers

General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers

09.1. Indicate if insights gained from your engagements are shared with your internal or external investment managers.

Type of engagement	Insights shared
Individual/Internal staff engagements	Yes, systematically Yes, occasionally No
Collaborative engagements	Yes, systematically Yes, occasionally No
Service provider engagements	Yes, systematically Yes, occasionally No

09.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Information about engagement progress (both qualitatively as well as milestone progress) is shared on a quarterly basis with the ACTIAM Selection Committee, comprising the CEO (in the role of Chair), CIO, Head of ESG Research and an external expert who is also a Professor of Ethics. Furthermore, there is an ongoing dialogue about engagements with the investment managers. In the case of positive selection engagements, dialogues with the companies are often conducted together with portfolio managers. Engagements can also be conducted together with external investment managers in case that is relevant, for example because of location or language matters.

LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of engagements your organisation participates in.

Type of engagement	Tracking engagements
Individual / Internal staff engagements	Yes, we track the number of our engagements in full Yes, we partially track the number of our engagements We do not track
Collaborative engagements	Yes, we track the number of our engagements in full Yes, we partially track the number of our engagements We do not track and cannot estimate our engagements
Service provider engagements	Yes, we track the number of our engagements in full Yes, we partially track the number of our engagements We do not track and cannot estimate our engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

ACTIAM tracks the number of engagements on an ongoing basis and formally submits them on a quarterly basis to the ACTIAM Selection Committee. The number of engagements, as well as milestone progress, is also reported to clients as well as externally on our website. In 2016, ACTIAM built a new database to track the number and progress of engagements, allowing us to measure our impact and improve our engagement strategy.

Previous Section Next Section