This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Bradesco Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

Overview

LEA 01. Description of approach to engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

01.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal engagement policy.

01.5. Additional information [optional]


LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues

02.1. Indicate the method of engagement, giving reasons for the interaction.

Type of engagement

Reason for interaction

Individual/Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

Service provider engagements

02.2. Additional information. [Optional]

All individual engagements are conducted by the ESG analyst with support of the financial industry analysts.


Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

After gathering public information on ESG performance of invested company, an individual meeting is schedule to verify information and engage companies on their gaps and concerns regarding the issues comprised by BRAM's ESG research methodology.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take following your engagements.

04.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.5. Additional information. [Optional]


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagements

05.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise collaborative engagements

05.3. Additional information [Optional]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

06.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities carried out collaboratively.

06.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions companies take following your collaborative engagements.

06.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals related to engagement activities carried out via collaborations.

06.5. Additional information. [Optional]

BRAM is coordinator of ESG Best Practices Working Group of PRI Brazil .


Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers

LEA 07. Role in engagement process

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

07.1. Indicate if you play a role in the engagement process that your service provider conducts on your behalf.

07.2. Indicate the role(s) you play in engagements that your service provider conducts on your behalf.

07.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 08. Monitor / discuss service provider information

08.1. Indicate whether you monitor and/or discuss the following information provided to you by your service provider

Please select all that apply

08.2. Additional information. [Optional]

All engagement activities are closely discussed with our investment team, from determining ESG issues to be discussed with investment companies to the follow-up of individual meetings.


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of engagements your organisation participates in.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

Service provider engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

All individual engagement activites are monitored and reported to our internal staff by our service provider. As of collaborative engagements, BRAM monitors the initiatives together with the Brazilian PRI Network.


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort

11.1. Indicate the amount of your listed equities portfolio with which your organisation engaged during the reporting year.

Number of companies engaged

(avoid double counting, see explanatory notes)

Proportion (to the nearest 5%)
Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Individual / Internal staff engagements

127 Number of companies engaged
6 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Collaborative engagements

4
1 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Service provider engagements

88
4 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

11.2. Indicate the proportion of engagements that involved multiple, substantive and detailed discussions or interactions with a company during the reporting year relating to ESG issue.

Type of engagement

% Comprehensive engagements

 

 

Individual / Internal staff engagements

 

 

Collaborative engagements

 

 

Service provider engagements

11.3. Indicate the percentage of your collaborative engagements for which you were a leading organisation during the reporting year.

Type of engagement

% Leading role

 

 

Collaborative engagements

11.4. Indicate the percentage of your service provider engagements that you were highly involved in during the reporting year.

Type of engagement

% High involvement

 

 

Service provider engagements

11.5. Additional information. [Optional]

BRAM's equity research team gets involved in all engaement activities, from determining the ESG issues to be discussed with invested companies to the follow-up of individual meetings and discussion of results


LEA 12. Engagement methods

12.1. Indicate which of the following your engagement involved.

12.2. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues

13.1. Indicate if your engagements in the reporting year covered E, S and/or G issues, providing an estimation of the breakdown.

Individual / Internal staff engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

Collaborative engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

Service provider engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

13.2. Additional information. [optional]


LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement

14.1. Indicate whether you track the number of cases during the reporting year where a company changed its practices, or made a formal commitment to do so, following your organisation’s and/or your service provider's engagement activities.

14.3. Additional information [Optional].


LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements

15.1. Provide examples of the engagements that your organisation or your service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Topic or ESG issue
          Direct contact with the companies through e-mail to check and engage them on ESG issues base on our methodology
        
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies 

Scope and Process
Outcomes
Topic or ESG issue
          Direct contact with the companies through e-mail to check and engage them on ESG issues base on our methodology
        
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies

Scope and Process
Outcomes
Topic or ESG issue
          Direct contact with the companies from Beverage, Food and Agriculture sectors to engage them on ESG issues discussed during the ESG Best Practices Working Group
        
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies

Scope and Process
Outcomes

15.2. Additional information. [Optional]


Communication

LEA 16. Disclosure of approach to ESG engagements

16.1. Indicate whether your organisation proactively discloses information on its engagements.

16.5. Indicate what engagement information your organisation proactively discloses to clients/beneficiaries.

Engagement information disclosed

16.6. Indicate how frequently you typically report engagements information

16.8. Additional information. [Optional]


Top