This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Bradesco Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

serch-btn
Organisational Overview
Basic Information [OO 01 - 09] Gateway asset class implementation indicators [OO 10 - 12]
Strategy and Governance
Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Implementation not in other modules [SG 12 - 16] Innovation [SG 17]
Direct - Listed Equity Incorporation
Overview [LEI 01 - 02] ESG incorporation in actively managed listed equities [LEI 03 - 12] Implementation processes [LEI 03 - 12] (A) Implementation: Screening [LEI 06 - 08] (C) Implementation: Integration of ESG issues [LEI 10 - 12] ESG incorporation in passively managed listed equities [LEI 13] Outputs and outcomes [LEI 14 - 16] Communication [LEI 17]
Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership
Engagement [LEA 01 - 16] Overview [LEA 01 - 02] Process [LEA 03 - 10] Process for engagements run internally [LEA 03 - 04] Process for engagements conducted via collaborations [LEA 05 - 06] Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers [LEA 07 - 08] General processes for all three groups of engagers [LEA 09 - 10] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 11 - 15] Communication [LEA 16] (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions [LEA 17 - 27] Overview [LEA 17] Process [LEA 18 - 22] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 23 - 26] Communication [LEA 27]
Direct - Fixed Income
Overview [FI 01 - 03] ESG incorporation in actively managed fixed income [FI 04 - 16] Implementation processes [FI 04 - 06] (C) Implementation: Integration [FI 14 - 16] Fixed income - Engagement [FI 18 - 20] Outputs and outcomes [FI 21 - 22] Communication [FI 23]
Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort

11.1. Indicate the amount of your listed equities portfolio with which your organisation engaged during the reporting year.

Number of companies engaged

(avoid double counting, see explanatory notes)
Proportion (to the nearest 5%)
Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Individual / Internal staff engagements
127 Number of companies engaged
6 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Collaborative engagements
4
1 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Service provider engagements
88
4 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

11.2. Indicate the proportion of engagements that involved multiple, substantive and detailed discussions or interactions with a company during the reporting year relating to ESG issue.

Type of engagement

% Comprehensive engagements

 

 

Individual / Internal staff engagements

 

 

Collaborative engagements

 

 

Service provider engagements

11.3. Indicate the percentage of your collaborative engagements for which you were a leading organisation during the reporting year.

Type of engagement

% Leading role

 

 

Collaborative engagements

11.4. Indicate the percentage of your service provider engagements that you were highly involved in during the reporting year.

Type of engagement

% High involvement

 

 

Service provider engagements

11.5. Additional information. [Optional]

BRAM's equity research team gets involved in all engaement activities, from determining the ESG issues to be discussed with invested companies to the follow-up of individual meetings and discussion of results

LEA 12. Engagement methods

12.1. Indicate which of the following your engagement involved.

12.2. Additional information. [Optional]

LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues

13.1. Indicate if your engagements in the reporting year covered E, S and/or G issues, providing an estimation of the breakdown.

Individual / Internal staff engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

Collaborative engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

Service provider engagements

0 % Environmental only
0 % Social only
0 % Corporate Governance only
100 % Overlapping ESG issues
Total 100%

13.2. Additional information. [optional]

LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement

14.1. Indicate whether you track the number of cases during the reporting year where a company changed its practices, or made a formal commitment to do so, following your organisation’s and/or your service provider's engagement activities.

14.3. Additional information [Optional].

LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements

15.1. Provide examples of the engagements that your organisation or your service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Topic or ESG issue 
          Direct contact with the companies through e-mail to check and engage them on ESG issues base on our methodology
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies 
Scope and Process
Outcomes
Topic or ESG issue 
          Direct contact with the companies through e-mail to check and engage them on ESG issues base on our methodology
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies
Scope and Process
Outcomes
Topic or ESG issue 
          Direct contact with the companies from Beverage, Food and Agriculture sectors to engage them on ESG issues discussed during the ESG Best Practices Working Group
Conducted by
Objectives

To increase ESG disclosure by listed companies
Scope and Process
Outcomes

15.2. Additional information. [Optional]

Previous Section Next Section
Top