This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

PM Capital

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process

Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメント活動を特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

03.2. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する際に使用する基準を説明してください。

その他

          Company Level - Engagement by Portfolio Managers who is in charge of the company analysis.
        

03.3. 補足情報。 [任意]

PM CAPITAL has a reputation for encouraging good ESG practices and we regularly engage the management of the companies that we own around the continuous improvement of ESG practices.
Failing a suitable outcome, we are happy to approach the boards of listed companies directly, as well as taking our case to the press.


We will generally oppose proposals where we see:

  • The election of inappropriate directors, particularly where there is not a majority of independent directors or where there has been excessive turnover of board / senior executives
  • Excessive management remuneration arrangements, or a lack of alignment between executive incentive structures and a company’s operating performance
  • The appointment of auditors who are not independent.
  • Agitating for change in this way helps us to unlock the inherent value in a company in order to achieve a better outcome for our investors.

One example involved Austar which, as part of their Employee Share Plan, provided $43 million in interest-free loans to 13 senior managers and an $8.2 million interest-free loan to their chief executive.


As a minority shareholder, we were unable to block the employee share plan and so raised our concerns with management. We then voiced our views in the press to ensure that the new Employee Share Plan had more appropriate incentives in place.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. 協働的なエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

05.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers

LEA 07. Role in engagement process

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

07.1. サービスプロバイダーがあなたの貴社のために実施するエンゲージメントにおいて、貴社がどのような役割を担っているのか明示してください。

07.3. 補足情報。 [任意]


LEA 08. Monitor / discuss service provider information

08.1. サービスプロバイダーが貴社に提供する以下の情報を監視、協議しているかどうかを記載してください。

Please select all that apply

08.2. 補足情報。


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. 貴社がエンゲージメントしている企業の数を追跡しているかどうかを記載してください。

エンゲージメントの種類
エンゲージメントの追跡
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

サービスプロバイダーのエンゲージメント

10.2. 補足情報。[任意]


Top