This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

PM Capital

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process

Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

other description

          Company Level - Engagement by Portfolio Managers who is in charge of the company analysis.
        

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

PM CAPITAL has a reputation for encouraging good ESG practices and we regularly engage the management of the companies that we own around the continuous improvement of ESG practices.
Failing a suitable outcome, we are happy to approach the boards of listed companies directly, as well as taking our case to the press.


We will generally oppose proposals where we see:

  • The election of inappropriate directors, particularly where there is not a majority of independent directors or where there has been excessive turnover of board / senior executives
  • Excessive management remuneration arrangements, or a lack of alignment between executive incentive structures and a company‚Äôs operating performance
  • The appointment of auditors who are not independent.
  • Agitating for change in this way helps us to unlock the inherent value in a company in order to achieve a better outcome for our investors.

One example involved Austar which, as part of their Employee Share Plan, provided $43 million in interest-free loans to 13 senior managers and an $8.2 million interest-free loan to their chief executive.


As a minority shareholder, we were unable to block the employee share plan and so raised our concerns with management. We then voiced our views in the press to ensure that the new Employee Share Plan had more appropriate incentives in place.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagements

05.3. Additional information [Optional]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers

LEA 07. Role in engagement process

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

07.1. Indicate if you play a role in the engagement process that your service provider conducts on your behalf.

07.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 08. Monitor / discuss service provider information

08.1. Indicate whether you monitor and/or discuss the following information provided to you by your service provider

Please select all that apply

08.2. Additional information. [Optional]


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of engagements your organisation participates in.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

Collaborative engagements

Service provider engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]


Top