This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Elo Mutual Pension Insurance Company

PRI reporting framework 2017

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Process

Process

LEA 18. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

18.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.

Approach

Based on

18.2. Additional information.[Optional]

In Finland we use our own research and make voting decisions without the use of service providers. Outside of Finland we use our service provider to provide us broadly information about the company history of each ballot item and information regarding e.g. specific sector or country. We use this information combined with our own experience and knowledge to form our decision for voting activity which complies with our voting policy.


LEA 19. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 20. Confirmation of votes (Not Completed)


LEA 21. Securities lending programme (Private)


LEA 22. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

22.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

22.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

22.3. Additional information. [Optional]

In such a case we usually pursue to interact with the company before the AGM regarding our ownership policy. With this practice we aim to change the proposal to be in line with our policy. We have published our ownership policy on our website and it is available easily also to company management and board members.

 


Top