This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Danske Bank

PRI reporting framework 2017

Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Process


LEA 18. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

18.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.


Based on

18.2. Additional information.[Optional]

Our service provider forms an opinion on each item at AGM/EGMs and formulate their recommendations accordingly. Our RI team provides our portfolio managers with these recommendations. These can help guide them in the voting process but our portfolio managers always make their own recommendations based on their extensive knowledge and dialogue with our portfolio companies so we use our service providers’ recommendations as third party input.

LEA 19. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 20. Confirmation of votes (Private)

LEA 21. Securities lending programme (Private)

LEA 22. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

22.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

          When there is a need for holding discussions with the company management directly.

22.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

          In some cases we have chosen to elaborate on our concerns and the company has sometimes chosen to amend their proposals because of this. However, we have not communicated actively about these rationales publicly.

22.3. Additional information. [Optional]